NET NUTRALITY REPEAL CELEBRATION THREAD

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Individual state laws are not efficient here due to the scope of interstate commerce. I mean, come on, it's the freaking internet. There's a reason the constitution has the commerce clause. It's for this exact type of situation. The issue is literally broader than any given state's sovereignty.

this argument is crazy.

Are you saying that comcast will just up and leave california high and dry without internet because they have their own regulations LOL

naw.. sorry, this is both the way its going go go from here on out, and will work in consumers favor, as well as free Americans who do not want the government controlling their lives and things exactly like TODAY happening.

If the government made it a states right choice, this argument would not be happening at all.

I mean the nerve in saying "the government cant manage this on a state level, so one goverment agency should do it for ALL the states" is totally baffling, like how do you draw these lines of conclusions? How do you not see the irony?

[mickmoranis]

State has NN laws? internet is not changed... state has no NN laws? the internet is throttled.

What the hell you think is too hard to manage? You have to be willfully ignoring reality to say that its "impossible" for states to manage this lmao that is just pure insanity, i am sorry I dont need to be harsh, but I'm loling irl.

[skarlorn]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

VAYA CON DIOS

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

fucking cool post

[AzzarTheGod]

yea totalitarian trillionaires with autonomy,

get ready for the future

they got the economy hijacked like a robbery,



you livin in poverty property with no commodity

draconian colony bringing only israeli policy

arcane symbology an omen for the future,



get ready 4 the war, like the streets of Fallujah

what you know about the USS COLE or the World trade c3nter,

We gotta bring heat, or be another Bill Cooper

[mickmoranis]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Frieza_Prexus]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this argument is crazy.

Are you saying that comcast will just up and leave california high and dry without internet because they have their own regulations LOL

naw.. sorry, this is both the way its going go go from here on out, and will work in consumers favor, as well as free Americans who do not want the government controlling their lives and things exactly like TODAY happening.

If the government made it a states right choice, this argument would not be happening at all.

I mean the nerve in saying "the government cant manage this on a state level, so one goverment agency should do it for ALL the states" is totally baffling, like how do you draw these lines of conclusions? How do you not see the irony?

It's not that each state can't handle it. It's that each state will handle it differently and you won't know which standard applies when there's confusion because they are all co-equal sovereigns. How do you resolve a conflict of law?

It's called jurisdiction. If I try to watch a Netflix movie from a server hosted across state lines, whose laws apply? Can my local ISP which is a satellite of a national corporation follow the laws of the state it is in, but not the one it provides service in when those laws conflict? This is Government 101. Federal preemption exists because this can get convoluted quickly with no real solution.

It sounds great to shout "states rights! rabble rabble rabble" until you start to try and work out the particulars in a logical and enforceable fashion. You know, actually try to govern. It's been done before, and it's not pretty. Even if we make each ISP and service provider host a server in each individual state, this still solves nothing because they will all interact with each other. Not only is this not economically feasible, it does nothing to solve the issue. Should Californians not be able to access the Texas internet? Because with what you're saying, a total segregation of services is the only way to achieve consistency.

Secondly, I think you might be misunderstanding why so many oppose the repeal. The issues without NN is not "oh we have to pay a bit more." If it was simply that, people would grumble and move on. The issue is that no NN means that anti-competitive practices are not only allowed, but practically required.

Netflix is a textbook example. ISPs have a financial stake in other streaming services. Should they be allowed to throttle Netflix so as to be unwatchable so that consumers will have to switch to Hulu instead? it's one thing to have a competitive edge, it's another thing entirely to make it so that consumers have no real choice. This encourages the dystopia that you're so insistent the government is trying to create with NN.

[hyejin]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yea totalitarian trillionaires with autonomy,

get ready for the future

they got the economy hijacked like a robbery,



you livin in poverty property with no commodity

draconian colony bringing only israeli policy

arcane symbology an omen for the future,



get ready 4 the war, like the streets of Fallujah

what you know about the USS COLE or the World trade c3nter,

We gotta bring heat, or be another Bill Cooper

👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾

[Kaino]

looking forward to just ordering a youtube and 4chan package for less than 5$ meanwhile netflix faggots will finally be paying their 80$ a month share for raping bandwidth

[mickmoranis]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not that each state can't handle it. It's that each state will handle it differently and you won't know which standard applies when there's confusion because they are all co-equal sovereigns. How do you resolve a conflict of law?

what does the confusion matter to you or I or anyone except comcast?

You dont cary your laws with you when you travel, and if you get to a state that has bad internet, youll just have to suck it up that you cant watch youtube or some shit there as easily.

this isnt fricking gun laws wher epeople own a product that is illegal in one state but not in another...

Its just how water is payed for in one state vs another

do you even know how the water bill works in different counties? let alone different states?

Why doesnt this confusion keep you from sleeping at night? Because it does not matter. Thats why. So there is no confusion.

try again. Oh by the way, you may as well get over it and just say, ok states rights it is... cus thats literally the way it is now. SO its either that, or nothing for ya.. .sorry! just tyin to make you see the bright side of your very real life! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Kaino [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

looking forward to just ordering a youtube and 4chan package for less than 5$ meanwhile netflix faggots will finally be paying their 80$ a month share for raping bandwidth

heh...i dare you to try to just order HBO or just Showtime and cancel your basic cable channels.