![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
At the time I was a massive newb, and didn't really understand how the 'difficulty' was determined. Was it a random out of touch dev's opinion, based on data or what? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
For the first year it Was more like: High pop classes: druid, necro Decent pop classes: warrior, cleric, SK, paladin, ranger. wizard, mage Low pop classes rogue, shaman, monk It's a unicorn! pop classes: bard, enchanter By the end of kunark: High pop classes: druid, necro Decent pop classes: warrior, cleric, ranger, monk, shaman, rogue, bard Low pop classes : SK, paladin, enchanter, wizard, mage It's a unicorn! pop classes: NA | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Enchanter as a low population class by the end of Kunark isn't accurate to me. The term "holy trinity" (referring to having a Warrior, Enchanter, and Cleric in your party) was coined during Kunark. Enchanters were getting more popular by the month in 2000, people were understanding the power of their buffs and crowd control. Clarity was literally called "crack". I also find it strange you say Bard grew in popularity a lot between 1999 and the end of Kunark. I feel like they got less popular during that period, partially because more people were learning about their exp penalty, and partially because other classes (especially Enchanter) were getting more popular. I would say Bard got a bit more popular again during Velious, because more people were learning to mass AOE kite, but they were always one of the lower population classes.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
crabby old man playing 4000 year old goblin sim
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Nah, I am very sure the "difficulty rating" on character creation screen for your chosen Race/Class/Deity combination was there in 1999. I remember my Barbarian Shaman being listed as "medium" difficulty, and I remember making a Necromancer in 2000 and laughing at how it was listed as a "high" difficulty character. I found a thread here on the forum talking about it - https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...light=creation (someone has a link that shows all the character creation prompts and, yep, Barbarian Shaman is listed as medium difficulty, Shadowknight is always given a high difficulty rating, and Warriors who pick an evil race get a medium difficulty rating)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5exD3WThbg -- Video of classic character creation (look how cool it is, giving you a whole RPG intro page that describes the Race/Class combo you picked) https://forums.daybreakgames.com/eq/...mbered.251082/ Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Hmm, I remember people liking Bards plenty? They got movement speed, group healing, and corpse locating all at low level, and attack speed boost at fairly low level, all things that were greatly appreciated.
Although to be fair about Shadowknights, they were pretty much all concentrated in East Antonica, so people who started the game in that area probably saw more of them than I did (I played Barbarian Shaman and Gnome Magician). Even at higher levels though, I truly remember them being the least played class. I have hardly any memorable experiences of grouping with or playing against a Shadowknight back then. They were just there, the small amount of times I encountered them.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Accepting power leveling and pixel packages to swap from my Aradune Rogue to Green Rogue.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|