Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2021, 05:32 PM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,648
Default

This is a punishment your leader, specifically, wanted. When you have to eat that punishment, its quite hypocritical to start saying "Oh we shouldnt have to because [whatever reason]".

Maybe once you all realize that Arcler negotiates with his pseudo "im better than everyone" attitude in mind rather than the best interest of his guild youll elect different leadership to represent you. Until then, you're at his whim.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #2  
Old 03-03-2021, 05:58 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a punishment your leader, specifically, wanted. When you have to eat that punishment, its quite hypocritical to start saying "Oh we shouldnt have to because [whatever reason]".
No one said this.

I suggested something to look into for future punishments as this clearly was not what was intended. The overly harsh punishment was suppose to go hand n hand w a Rotational Agreement. The server rule is for when the agreements breakdown, but in this case never occurred.

The sliding scale I suggested should be considered if there is no rotational agreement for the Ring War cause legit attempts should not be put in the same light as troll ones.
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #3  
Old 03-03-2021, 06:10 PM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one said this.

I suggested something to look into for future punishments as this clearly was not what was intended. The overly harsh punishment was suppose to go hand n hand w a Rotational Agreement. The server rule is for when the agreements breakdown, but in this case never occurred.

The sliding scale I suggested should be considered if there is no rotational agreement for the Ring War cause legit attempts should not be put in the same light as troll ones.
Remind me, who refused to rotate the Ring Wars after it was pretty much agreed that we would after the mega ban?

Arcler again.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #4  
Old 03-03-2021, 06:17 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Remind me, who refused to rotate the Ring Wars after it was pretty much agreed that we would after the mega ban?

Arcler again.
How can I remind you when you answered yourself [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
  #5  
Old 03-03-2021, 06:59 PM
Hideousclaw Hideousclaw is offline
Sarnak

Hideousclaw's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: I am here
Posts: 398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Remind me, who refused to rotate the Ring Wars after it was pretty much agreed that we would after the mega ban?

Arcler again.
We offered Ring War rotation with 50% compete, 50% rotated non-compete. I even went as far as to say 1x FFA per rotation cycle, Arcler preferred to go all FFA or app rotated. Also pushed for the 3 week punishment. I really don’t understand people’s inability to meet in middle and compromise. Or even move slightly off their base, but here we are.
__________________
Daewen (Grandmaster) / Faedrith (Sorcerer) / Chonkapopolis (Beguiler) / Brodown (Warder) / Broo Scaredyou (Defiler) / Rodulation Modulation (Conjurer) / Gute Nacht (Bard)

<Gravity>
  #6  
Old 03-03-2021, 07:14 PM
xdrcfrx xdrcfrx is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 229
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hideousclaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We offered Ring War rotation with 50% compete, 50% rotated non-compete. I even went as far as to say 1x FFA per rotation cycle, Arcler preferred to go all FFA or app rotated. Also pushed for the 3 week punishment. I really don’t understand people’s inability to meet in middle and compromise. Or even move slightly off their base, but here we are.
Where are you guys at on this point, now? Seems disingenuous to tour your prior willingness to compromise if you feel otherwise in the present.
  #7  
Old 03-03-2021, 08:26 PM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one said this.

I suggested something to look into for future punishments as this clearly was not what was intended. The overly harsh punishment was suppose to go hand n hand w a Rotational Agreement. The server rule is for when the agreements breakdown, but in this case never occurred.

The sliding scale I suggested should be considered if there is no rotational agreement for the Ring War cause legit attempts should not be put in the same light as troll ones.
Sounds like maybe you should be negotiating for Riot instead of Arcler. Its shown time and time again that he only cares about himself and getting him to move either way is near impossible.

Maybe we could get somewhere with you there in his stead but no chance he gives up that power.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #8  
Old 03-03-2021, 06:03 PM
Toryas Toryas is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a punishment your leader, specifically, wanted. When you have to eat that punishment, its quite hypocritical to start saying "Oh we shouldnt have to because [whatever reason]".

Maybe once you all realize that Arcler negotiates with his pseudo "im better than everyone" attitude in mind rather than the best interest of his guild youll elect different leadership to represent you. Until then, you're at his whim.
You sound mad, want to show us on the doll where the mean pixel elf pilot touched you? PS, your signature is out of date.
  #9  
Old 03-03-2021, 06:53 PM
Cassawary Cassawary is offline
Planar Protector

Cassawary's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 912
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is a punishment your leader, specifically, wanted. When you have to eat that punishment, its quite hypocritical to start saying "Oh we shouldnt have to because [whatever reason]".

Maybe once you all realize that Arcler negotiates with his pseudo "im better than everyone" attitude in mind rather than the best interest of his guild youll elect different leadership to represent you. Until then, you're at his whim.
Hypocritical, you say? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #10  
Old 03-03-2021, 06:17 PM
Supreme Supreme is offline
Planar Protector

Supreme's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rivervale,Texas
Posts: 1,077
Default

It's just three weeks...
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.