Spells: damage shields doing reduced damage in pvp

[Bamzal Sherbet]

you ever hear of a development fork? your emu code is meaningless here

[MC Epic]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It did full damage in pvp.

There will be much crying and disputing, but it was full.

Damage shields did full damage.

[Nizzarr]

bump, another important pvp issue

[Technique]

November 2001:

Given how PvP works on the coin only servers, it is a joke that spell damage and pet damage is reduced to 66%, while melee damage, damage shields and archery, does 100% damage.

http://www.thesafehouse.org/forums/s...99&postcount=6

[Potus]

Oh my god that safehouse thread is hilarious; so many rogue apologists trying to rationalize pvp being imbalanced toward melees.

[p-niner]

Excellent find technique

[Nirgon]

Velious rogue chasing you with a primal bow, is um, I wouldn't say rogues suck at all

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Velious rogue chasing you with a primal bow, is um, I wouldn't say rogues suck at all

Ya I did it on loz rly funny.

Should also be noted that same safehouse thread has a guy claim ds damage is nerfed a few posts down.

-Highest druid dmg shield is 38 counting both the ac + ds + the pure ds which stack. This Ds does 25 in pvp due to pvp reduction

http://www.thesafehouse.org/forums/s...4&postcount=11

maybe differences in the pvp server rules?

[Potus]

Seeing that "Aerimus Shadowborn" is also saying incredibly stupid shit about PVP throughout that thread, I'm less inclined to believe him.

You see, Necros aren't crappy because Splurt does 1200 dmg!