![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
![]() Personally, I'd like to see the old server finished (content and mechanics-wise) before a new server.
| ||
|
#22
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Hey Ravager, no one would stop you from completing content on that server. A new server would moreso attract new players than leach existing players off blue. If there IS a max exodus from the current blue server, that in itself is telling. | |||
|
#23
|
|||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
| ||||||
Last edited by falkun; 08-14-2012 at 03:53 PM..
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
![]() I just meant it's probably be in the dev's best interest to finish one project before starting another. With another server to take care of, their limited resources would be spread even thinner and there would be two blue servers that are only half as good as they could be.
| ||
Last edited by Ravager; 08-14-2012 at 04:06 PM..
Reason: I misread the reply.
|
|
#25
|
|||
|
![]() nope. None of what you said will ever happen. Just let the crazies have a server and make another server.
It was the same way on live. Some servers were nuts, some were more tame. with only 1 viable server, all the nuts are on one box. Velious doesn't solve anything unless you're part of the aforementioned crazies. And for the "go start your own server then" folks: if someone else could get ahold of a way to do so as well as these guys have, I'd personally make a pledge of $30 bucks or so a month to keep it going. Also, I think that if bosses spawned simultaneously, TMO ( or someone else) would just put in more time to lock them down, split their raid forces, add more to their ranks, etc. They compete to be #1 because that's what matters to them. some of us don't see EQ as a competition and don't like to play it that way. nothing wrong with either way of playing, it's just those two types of players can't coexist, happily, for very long. Call it the pink panties server or whatever, but it's what many in the community are wanting. | ||
|
#26
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
To start a new server from scratch would be difficult, but to copy an existing server wouldn't be much work at all. As far as policing on a carebear server, there's a lot of viable candidates that play/have played p1999 and been a great part of the community that could serve as guides (even if only as observe/report). Just start a donation fund with a clear monetary goal to support a new server and watch it fill up fast enough to have it released in a week. | |||
|
#27
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Everyone and their mom had a monk or other melee twink in 2000. Everyone. Everyone. EVERYONE. Half of my guild had twink monks (even a number of fungi level twinks), and my guild was pretty casual. The reality is that most of the playerbase on p99 are the top 30% of engaged players back in the day. This means we know the tricks and the shortcuts a lot better than the more casual players did, and hindsight makes us incredibly more knowledgable now than we were back then, so it compounds itself. But let's not come with nonsense about powerleveling and twinking being uncommon. Lol. I actually two-boxed occasionally between two desktop PCs in the Velious era (different rooms and I wasn't allowed to move the PCs, which made it really difficult, but possible) - had a shaman buffing my monk while I destroyed crap in Velk's. And again, on live, I never did any of the major velious raids (we did Kael but never Vindi), Plane of Sky, CT, Innothule...Any of that. I wasn't among the elite playerbase. But even I saw the twinking and two-boxing (although technology made that harder) and powerleveling all the time. | |||
|
#28
|
|||
|
![]() It's not that twinking wasn't common on live in 2000ish, its just that twinking to this degree wasn't.
on live, pre 2002ish>? maybe later I had never seen a twink with a COF/Fungi/Tstaff. It was unheard of. on p1999 it's pretty much the only way to qualify as a twink. For every class minus casters (which can't REALLY be twinked before velious) the degree of twinking is insane. Epics are commonplace (minus a few) on twinks There are almost no "oh shit" items left except for ones that were nerfed out quickly. | ||
|
#29
|
|||
|
![]() I suppose a time frame would help; as well as defining "twink."
A hand-me-down or two isn't what I meant. Farming plats or camping numerous spawns with high level characters to gear up a low level alt; that's a twink. The common player did not really twink (hence, "uncommon") in classic. It started to occur near the end of classic; and picked up during Kunark. By Velious, heavy twinking was in full force. But as tops says, above, the really stupid twinking was quite rare. | ||
|
#30
|
|||
|
![]() Messianc is right. I started the 2nd month of classic EQ and was often grouping with people who were going "the second time around", meaning to 50. And with awesome gear (for the day). Like a lvl 35 or so dorf paladin with a Skarlon sword (main was a famous E`ci cleric).
But I will agree there are some ubertwinks here that weren't seen on Live (like whoever bought Durison's Cobalt BP at that time). | ||
Last edited by Raavak; 08-14-2012 at 04:58 PM..
|
|
![]() |
|
|