Freedom From Atheism Foundation

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

if you're bringing in the fossil evidence claim, and not considering a force of geology like erosion then you're trying to stipulate a specific that won't hold up to basic scrutiny. it's hard to analyze a fossil that has been weathered into dirt particles that are spread hundreds if not thousands of miles by the wind.

What about soft tissue fossils? Do they stand up to the scrutiny of 450 mn year old claims?

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about soft tissue fossils? Do they stand up to the scrutiny of 450 mn year old claims?

depending on hyper specificity is how one hangs their self in an argument

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

depending on hyper specificity is how one hangs their self in an argument

You have certainly provided yourself enough rope.

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have certainly provided yourself enough rope.

a fossil is a fossil regardless of the tissue

[Nihilist_santa]

You don't go we have a theory of evolution now lets look everywhere for signs to support this. This is just confirmation bias. With the above example of pleiotropy we can see that evidence is deemed not concrete unless it fits the model. They are just sifting or cherry picking data that supports the model. It is like climate change but because we live in a society of learned experts we are not supposed to question their authority.

[Rellapse40]

"Radiometric dating of the rock formation that contained fossils from the early dinosaur genus Eoraptor at 231.4 million years old establishes its presence in the fossil record at this time."

230 million old fossils of dinosaurs but 0 fossils to prove evolution is true

k

dumb *****s

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Rellapse40 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Radiometric dating of the rock formation that contained fossils from the early dinosaur genus Eoraptor at 231.4 million years old establishes its presence in the fossil record at this time."

230 million old fossils of dinosaurs but 0 fossils to prove evolution is true

k

dumb *****s

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/cyanofr.html

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ahldagor]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4846410.html

[Versch]

3 reasonable posts in a row.

Time for more faux-intellectual gobbledy****

[Faron]

46 pages of fats trying to sound enlightened.