![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Last I checked most of the TMO accounts linked to duping / exploiting ( and RMTing) were only suspended as it was a very small minority who had access to a large number of accounts thereby compromising them.
Then again how much of a loss is it when you lose one VP geared toon while having 5 more geared and banked alts ready to step in. What do you think people have been doing farming the same content over the past 3 years? | ||
|
Last edited by Duckwalk; 03-26-2014 at 11:25 AM..
|
|
||
|
#5
|
|||
|
edit: I was in the wrong thread! This makes more sense!
__________________
Kekephee Souphanousinphone
Erudite Bard <BDA> Blue Server Every song I play is actually just me screaming the 1812 Overture in a raspy, shrieking falsetto. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Which brings me to my next question: Why do the RMT folks get permanently banned as opposed to temporary bans given out to the game exploiters? Seems to me the real damage is not even comparable. Some Joe buys a FBSS for $20 from platlord and his account gets the death penalty where as P1999 Platinum exploiters get a month or two ban? I am all for a draconian punishment for rule breakers, however the judgement being served in these two cases is like giving the High School weed dealer the guillotine and then letting El Chapo and his murdering buddies perform community service for snorting a pallet of cocaine in a human trafficking hotel..[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
Only 2 people were exploiting. We banned every account they had logged into over the course of ~3 years, even if it was only a single time. When the actual owners of the accounts petitioned, we dropped the bans to suspensions on a case-by-case basis, so long as the account was clean and had a limited number of logins from one of the people who exploited. If we had thought leadership or a larger portion of the guild was involved, we would have disbanded the guild and held leadership responsible. The exploiters themselves got not only their accounts permanently banned, but also a number of accounts that weren't even theirs banned as well (based on high # of logins) So, yes, I'd say that's substantially worse. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
P99 staffers keep more records on your login habbits than the US government does! ha!
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|