Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:05 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey DSM, do you think that allowing for outside buffs should still be on the Solo artist challange?

I think that's a reasonable update.

Should we as a community change the rules, everyone? Seems fair, but I haven't been as invested as some of the other solo artists since velious.

(lets see how DSM replies to this post)
Personally I think outside buffs for melees is fine. In the case of OP, he didn't actually need Aego to finish the fight, as he never took like 3k+ worth if damage in a short time. The extra HP from Aego just saved him some Wort Pot money.

We would have to find a specific mob that would require the extra HP from Aego to clearly make the argument that OP or other melee solo artists actually needed Aego to win the fight as opposed to using Wort Pots. The idea would be to show it is not mathematically possible to kill this mob with the melee solo artist's existing max HP self buffed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:06 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is offline
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 4,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Personally I think outside buffs for melees is fine. In the case of OP, he didn't actually need Aego to finish the fight, as he never took like 3k+ worth if damage in a short time. The extra HP from Aego just saved him some Wort Pot money.

We would have to find a specific mob that would require the extra HP from Aego to clearly make the argument that OP or other melee solo artists actually needed aego to win the fight vs. using Wort Pots. The idea would be to show it is not mathematically possible with his existing max HP self buffed.
Oh gosh, look, a reasonable throughout respectful reply.

Hmm I wonder if it's not a DSM problem.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:11 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh gosh, look, a reasonable throughout respectful reply.

Hmm I wonder if it's not a DSM problem.
I'm wondering why he focused on Aego. The OP was raid buffed in the original video and I didn't notice Aego in the third iteration, but still had many other raid buffs.

Maybe DSM doesn't know about raid buffs? Just like he doesn't know the difference between CH chain and CH clickies or when the swing timer starts on an offhand attack.

This is the root of the problem: He's presenting himself as some sort of expert on the subject of EQ, and he sees anybody who can prove that incorrect as a threat. He resorts to calling them names and follows them around to several threads with the intent to attack them.

Just like he did on this one.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
Last edited by Samoht; 07-03-2025 at 01:22 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:00 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is offline
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 4,318
Default

Feel free?

Open source?

Posting parses??

What an argumentitive asshole!

(SARCASM).

Loramin, your accusations do not hold up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:15 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is offline
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 4,318
Default

In the consumable less one (try 3?) he had ageo and some shaman buffs. So I agree there is some discussion to be had!

Quote:
Maybe DSM doesn't know about raid buffs? Just like he doesn't know the difference between CH chain and CH clickies or when the swing timer starts on an offhand attack.
You are a master poster sir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is why the oreo factory will never get back into production once you 3 take over [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:19 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In the consumable less one (try 3?) he had ageo and some shaman buffs. So I agree there is some discussion to be had!
Yeah, I wasn't going to try to dissect that blurry mess that hard. I was done when he still had FoS and VoG.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:23 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is offline
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 4,318
Default

I for one would think [S] should not allow for outside buffs. It just wont ever feel solo to me otherwise.

But despite all your guy's rage, one of you updated the wiki during this to say that.

So, I guess this has been a productive conversation!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:28 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,547
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I for one would think [S] should not allow for outside buffs. It just wont ever feel solo to me otherwise.

But despite all your guy's rage, one of you updated the wiki during this to say that.

So, I guess this has been a productive conversation!
I wonder how long it's going to take before the updates to get defaced.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:50 PM
DeathsSilkyMist DeathsSilkyMist is offline
Planar Protector

DeathsSilkyMist's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I wonder how long it's going to take before the updates to get defaced.
Updating the wiki due to being angry and trying to win an argument was the only potential defacement that has been done.

If people want to actually have a conversation about changing the wiki that doesn't involve character attacks and edits that were not well written/thought out, I'd be happy to do so. But that should be another thread. OP's thread is not about changing the wiki or solo artist challenge rules.
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 07-03-2025 at 01:55 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-03-2025, 01:55 PM
Zuranthium Zuranthium is offline
Planar Protector

Zuranthium's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 1,904
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I for one would think [S] should not allow for outside buffs. It just wont ever feel solo to me otherwise.
There's some further discussion to be had about buffs, yeah. The amount used can vary a lot. S-tier means using less than your max HP of consumable items while having no outside buffs, so getting outside buffs instead of using consumables should also not exceed that level of effect.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.