2020 Election MEGAthread

[Castle2.0]

Trump is stubborn and Joe is corrupt. No way this ends without litigation, potential recounts, and a whollllllle lot of BS.

Hopefully every LEGITIMATE vote is counted and any fraud is undone. That's how democracy should work. If Biden wins, he wins. If Trump wins, he wins.

I am gonna let them work it out in the courts without freaking out. I'll be keeping a close eye on reports of fraud - seen some preliminary ones, but I need some real proof to jump on it / share it here.

Chill out, boys. It's gonna be a bit.

[douglas1999]

I, personally, think it's awesome if somebody else decides for me what I should or shouldn't hear or read.

[Morton Jr]

social media cant sniff out fake news and regulate whats posted

too many trolls

[Woke Locc]

Originally Posted by douglas1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I, personally, think it's awesome if somebody else decides for me what I should or shouldn't hear or read.

protip: click View and stop being a baby about it.

[FatherSioux]

Genuinely curious if anyone can speak to vote reporting practices. Hypothetically if one candidate received a batch of 140k votes at 2AM but none of those went to any other candidate, is that reasonable? I'm assuming how it goes is you tabulate ALL votes for your area and then report. It's not like they count all biden votes, all trump votes etc and then report based on candidate right?

[cd288]

Originally Posted by BlackBellamy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh thanks! My concern is that "delicate" and "misleading" and all the reasons being articulated about whether someone's opinion should be allowed to circulate are specious.

Like I'm not seeing anything about Matt Walsh's post that's misleading. He's expressing his opinion about the statistical improbability mentioned below, which is documented. And if he's inflaming passions to an undue degree that he deserves to be censored, that's just a matter of opinion. For example I don't think he's doing that at all.

What I wouldn't mind is Twitter's counterpoint. Because it's THEIR opinion about whether something is inflaming or misleading. So if I can't see Matt's post without two extra clicks that's fine but part of that clicking should involve a reasoned explanation why he's misleading or what is factually incorrect. But I don't get that so it's just twitter telling me this guy is a liar but all they're doing is calling him a liar.

I also understand Twitter can do whatever it wants, so I'm not telling them they can't.

I just find it amusing how weak 'some of the content is disputed and might be misleading' is as an explanation. Who is disputing? Are they better or worse than Matt? I don't know. I don't know anything except when I want to read something sometimes the technocrats let me read it and sometimes they seed my mind that I'm about to be lied to by making me take positive physical action to affirm that I understand I am being subjected to operant conditioning.

I get what you're saying but I do think it's very misleading to say that no one can look at this and think something normal etc. is going on. Because it is normal. Nothing fraudulent is occurring. So alluding otherwise is very misleading and completely unhelpful and undermines the legitimate election process.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you don't think it's fishy that 138,000 votes for a single candidate just showed up with no changes in any other candidates overnight? hmm

It is odd, but definitely not impossible. It's totally dependent on the order in which certain batches of ballots get processed.

It is funny though, all the Trump supporters (and I was one of them in 2016) yelled at the Liberals about how they need to accept the results of the election when they lost...yet now in 2020 it looks like Trump may possibly lose and all the Trump supporters are suddenly unwilling to accept that result and are up in arms about it. Where did the whole "you people need to accept the results of the election and stop complaining"
go? Hypocrisy much? lol

[Topgunben]

Well friends. it looks like Trump has lost. Without Wisconsin, Michigan or Arizona he stands no chance even if he wins Pennsylvania. Anyone thinking Trump can win this at this point is grasping at straws.

We had a good run with Trump, even though I didnt vote for him in 2016, he turned out to be my favorite President of all time. As much as it sucks, hopefully Biden will live long enough to keep Kamala out of power.

[Angerclaw]

Originally Posted by Topgunben [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well friends. it looks like Trump has lost. Without Wisconsin, Michigan or Arizona he stands no chance even if he wins Pennsylvania. Anyone thinking Trump can win this at this point is grasping at straws.

We had a good run with Trump, even though I didnt vote for him in 2016, he turned out to be my favorite President of all time. As much as it sucks, hopefully Biden will live long enough to keep Kamala out of power.

PA, NC, GA, NV = Trump win.

[Topgunben]

Originally Posted by Angerclaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

PA, NC, GA, NV = Trump win.

He wont win Nevada. I meant to put that on my list