Freedom From Atheism Foundation

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by DeruIsLove [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do your own research. I'm not here to hold your hand when you don't even have a basic idea of what the evolutionary process is. What was it? "A to B to C = X or some drivel? Considering there are more links between great apes and man than letters in the alphabet exist, why bother arguing when you ignore that too?

I have done a great deal of research. I don't feel that my knowledge of the subject is absolute though. I'm just curious as to the info you have access to that is so insurmountable in favor of evolution. I have yet to find such evidence. If you do indeed have information to the degree that you claim, it would be worth your while to let us know so the whole debate can be put to rest.

[DeruIsLove]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have done a great deal of research. I don't feel that my knowledge of the subject is absolute though. I'm just curious as to the info you have access to that is so insurmountable in favor of evolution. I have yet to find such evidence. If you do indeed have information to the degree that you claim, it would be worth your while to let us know so the whole debate can be put to rest.

More evidence does not need to be provided, enough evidence is there to have the necessary models fir it to be a "scientific theory". The only reason the debate is even a thing is because of the willful ignorance of people like you who refuse to see the tangible evidence in front of them. There's no implying there's no assumption, stop pretending that there is.

Oh wait you and naez are both famous trolls on this subject.

[Ahldagor]

any of you looked into the demiurge or zoroastrianism?

[r00t]

There is a total lack of undisputed examples (fossilized or living) of the millions of transitional forms required for evolution to be true. Ape-to-human "missing links" are extremely subjective and based on evolutionists' already-formed assumptions. Often they are simply contrived.

Evolution is said to have begun by spontaneous generation. A concept ridiculed by biology. The high information content of DNA could only have come from intelligence. Mutations do not increase information, as required by evolution. Natural selection is conservative, not creative.

[Versch]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's been said before but the point is just so strong. A million monkeys on typewriters (in a word: randomness) would never bang out the source code for EverQuest. What makes you think something a trillion times more complex (the universe) could occur by randomness, for no reason?

Hey, the Clockmaker theory! Now that's a blast from the past.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

any of you looked into the demiurge or zoroastrianism?

Yes. Same basic concept as the Demiurge of Gnosticism.

[DeruIsLove]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

evolutionists

There is no such thing as an 'evolutionist' there are those who practice science and there those who don't. The term evolutionist was coined by naive naysayers in a desperate attempt to appeal to the masses when creationist dogma and non-science began to work in tandem with one another.

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Evolution is said to have begun by spontaneous generation.

No it is not. This is the fiftieth time you've tried to shove abiogenesis into the evolutionary debate.

They are two separate issues. Stop.

[r00t]

Evolutions envisages spontaneous generation continually producing simple forms of life that develop greater complexity in parallel lineages with an inherent progressive tendency

[r00t]

I mean you either believe in spontaneous generation, or God putting it there. It's black or white.

[Rellapse40]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There is a total lack of undisputed examples (fossilized or living) of the millions of transitional forms required for evolution to be true.