If you believe in god, you're an idiot...

[Shakedown7]

I BELIEVE IN CHARLES MANSON!

[purist]

My understanding is that a gnostic is someone who KNOWS God exists. Of course, none KNOWS God exists, hence, there are no gnostics in existence, only agnostics; ones who don't KNOW God exists. Everyone is an agnostic. It's a redundant, meaningless term. You're either an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheist.

A theist is someone who BELIEVES God exists. Obviously, an atheist is someone who doesn't. There is no gray area here. There is no in-between. Either you believe in God or you don't. If you have any doubt, you aren't a theist. You're an atheist. Get over it. If you say that you just ignore the question, or don't think it's relevant, or you're in between, or you don't think you have enough information to make a decision, guess what, you're still an atheist. QQ.

[chtulu]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My understanding is that a gnostic is someone who KNOWS God exists. Of course, none KNOWS God exists, hence, there are no gnostics in existence, only agnostics; ones who don't KNOW God exists. Everyone is an agnostic. It's a redundant, meaningless term. You're either an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheist.

A theist is someone who BELIEVES God exists. Obviously, an atheist is someone who doesn't. There is no gray area here. There is no in-between. Either you believe in God or you don't. If you have any doubt, you aren't a theist. You're an atheist. Get over it. If you say that you just ignore the question, or don't think it's relevant, or you're in between, or you don't think you have enough information to make a decision, guess what, you're still an atheist. QQ.

No reason to believe in God.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Of course, none KNOWS God exists...

false assumption. just for the sake of argument.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[chtulu]

Originally Posted by Humerox [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

false assumption. just for the sake of argument.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your assumption is that there is someone that KNOWS God.

[Harrison]

Originally Posted by chtulu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your assumption is that there is someone that KNOWS God.

And how exactly would you know that out of 6billion+ alive now, and however many dead since, someone hasn't in that time frame?

You wouldn't.

You're way out of your league little boy. I'd go back to Dr. Seuss so you can at least tell your friends you read books written by a doctor.

[zenoo]

I think Nalkins' next move is to link me to a Glen Beck website for further clarification. I correctly use the word agnostic everyday, thanks though buddy.

[chtulu]

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And how exactly would you know that out of 6billion+ alive now, and however many dead since, someone hasn't in that time frame?

You wouldn't.

You're way out of your league little boy. I'd go back to Dr. Seuss so you can at least tell your friends you read books written by a doctor.

Because he'd have to exist for that to happen.

Out of all those people, why wouldn't there have been proof yet?

Your argument is also your down fall.

[Harrison]

*yawn* Your arguments are almost poorly formed enough to appear made by a child.

[Slathar]

someone graduated from a state school and wants to show off their extensive knowledge they learned as theyre now an unemployed liberal arts major