I did not get the shots and do not regret it

[Bardp1999]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[magnetaress]

Originally Posted by Bardp1999 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Normally bardp is beneath me butt *they r on point here.

[Jibartik]

holy shit they about to prove the vax killed Kennedy?

https://apnews.com/article/fact-chec...s-587841121464

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

holy shit they about to prove the vax killed Kennedy?

https://apnews.com/article/fact-chec...s-587841121464

What's hilarious is the AP tries to debunk the claim, yet a few paragraphs down it says:

"Specifically, researchers found that rates of pulmonary embolism — blood clots in the lungs — met the threshold to be considered a statistical signal, which means an association between the vaccine and the health event was detected.

However, the researchers concluded in the paper that the FDA is currently not taking any regulatory actions based on the detection, because “the signals are still under investigation and require more robust study.”

So the study DID find that it causes blood clots.

They just need more time to come up with an excuse to explain it away.

When the AP is posting "nothing to see here!" articles, you know they're desperate.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Encroaching Death [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What's hilarious is the AP tries to debunk the claim, yet a few paragraphs down it says:

"Specifically, researchers found that rates of pulmonary embolism — blood clots in the lungs — met the threshold to be considered a statistical signal, which means an association between the vaccine and the health event was detected.

However, the researchers concluded in the paper that the FDA is currently not taking any regulatory actions based on the detection, because “the signals are still under investigation and require more robust study.”

So the study DID find that it causes blood clots.

They just need more time to come up with an excuse to explain it away.

When the AP is posting "nothing to see here!" articles, you know they're desperate.

Higher risk than other vaccinations? Not asking about reward.

[Encroaching Death]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Higher risk than other vaccinations? Not asking about reward.

Yeah

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Encroaching Death [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah

Specific to the Pfizer and not just because it's a vaccine?

I am not seeing that.

[magnetaress]

"Specifically, researchers found that rates of pulmonary embolism — blood clots in the lungs — met the threshold to be considered a statistical signal, which means an association between the vaccine and the health event was detected.

[Toxigen]

If you find yourself shilling the vax in 2023 you should log off irl.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you find yourself shilling the vax in 2023 you should log off irl.

Anyone taking advice from a guy with a signature like yours on an emulated server for a 23 year old elf simulator should probably consider doing the same