Quote:
Originally Posted by feniin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Go ahead and just pass me all of your social security when you hit 67. Lost your job? better not be collecting unemployment. Injured in the workplace? I don't want to see you collecting disability payments.
Farm having a tough time? better not be asking for subsidies. Roads fucked? deal with it - the government won't be repairing your road. Your kid need to go to school?(lol yeah right you're not having a child) Best be sending him to a private school because public schools don't exist for you.
Edit: House on fire? fuck you - pay the fireman to save your house or he's got better things to do. Police? nah. better call your private security force.
|
Defending socialized programs but doesn't even understand them. CHECK.
You are obviously so stupid and fit in the category of uneducated stay at home dads. Social security YOU PAY into and YOU are taxed on it. If you kept all the money, you would not be getting money when you are 67, you'd collect it all at face value. If you are successful, you don't need social security.
Injured in the workplace? That falls under Workman Comp and if you are collecting disability, there are plenty of charity organizations that you can utilize first.
You are even so stupid to think that Republicans don't want firemen (better check your privilege by the way because its fireperson nowadays). And yes it has been proven that private firms handle crime a lot better. There was a town outside Houston I think that completely fired all their police force and hired a private firm and crime dropped a large percent.
https://71republic.com/2017/11/20/th...ed-the-police/
Private organizations already pay for roads (toll roads) and many more. It's just a question of would you rather pay them in taxes or pay them to a private firm.