Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You clearly haven't used file versioning software.

Timeline:

YOU created a page named "Zuranthium's solo artist challenge"
Zuranthium objects to you creating content in their name and tries to remove it.
YOU restore the page that Zuranthium themselves removed.
Repeat 7 more times.

I think we all understand what happened here and why you were wiki suspended.

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Timeline:

YOU created a page named "Zuranthium's solo artist challenge"
Zuranthium objects to you creating content in their name and tries to remove it.
YOU restore the page that Zuranthium themselves removed.
Repeat 7 more times.

I think we all understand what happened here and why you were wiki suspended.

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

The edit history shows who created the file. No where in the wiki page did it say "created by Zuranthium". Nor did I claim he made the page. I said I made it for him. You can check the post history. It was just a copy of the solo artist challenge page with his modifiations, nothing else. You are just trolling with your false definition of impersonation.

The reality is Zuranthium deleted my attempt to diffuse the situation 8 times, and refused to take down his vague language he introduced into the wiki. He is the one refusing to accept any critisism.

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You don't get to change the rules (or metaphor) just because you're losing a fight. And really, as I keep trying to impress, you need to stop fighting all together.

Indeed. You should apply that rule equally, instead of letting Zuranthium do the same thing. Suspending Zuranthium and Samoht as well would be a lot more impartial.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The edit history shows who created the file. No where in the wiki page did it say "created by Zuranthium". Nor did I claim he made the page. I said I made it for him. You can check the post history. It was just a copy of the solo artist challenge page with his modifiations, nothing else. You are just trolling with your false definition of impersonation.

The reality is Zuranthium deleted my attempt to diffuse the situation 8 times, and refused to take down his vague language he introduced into the wiki. He is the one refusing to accept any critisism.

So you admit to creating the page in someone else's name. Now understand that they did not want that and tried to delete it.

Then you recreated it. Seven more times. You admitted that, too. Wowza.

Because you still insist that you have rights to create content with someone else's name on it. But in reality, you have no rights to impersonate someone else on the wiki.

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Indeed. You should apply that rule equally, instead of letting Zuranthium do the same thing. Suspending Zuranthium and Samoht as well would be a lot more impartial.

No one has contacted me about Zura or Sam abusing the wiki. If someone did, I would investigate it (impartially). If I found it was warranted, I would apply an appropriate penalty to them as well.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one has contacted me about Zura or Sam abusing the wiki. If someone did, I would investigate it (impartially). If I found it was warranted, I would apply an appropriate penalty to them as well.

I believe they did abuse the wiki by editing the wiki to win the argument in this thread, rather than do it objectively. I disagreed with their changes, but they kept putting their changes back in without compromise.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I believe they did abuse the wiki by editing the wiki to win the argument in this thread, rather than do it objectively. I disagreed with their changes, but they kept putting their changes back in without compromise.

Looking at https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history I see a bunch of passionate editors disagreeing, but no clear wiki abuse. I didn't wade through every edit though, so if someone wants to draw my attention to actual wiki abuse, I'll happily change my mind.

Otherwise, I think the best thing is to give that page a week to let everyone cool off. As others in this thread have noted, a fresh thread (not full of DSM fights) would be the ideal place to discuss this topic more dispassionately, and hopefully that can lead to some productive consensus about the best direction of the page.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one has contacted me about Zura or Sam abusing the wiki. If someone did, I would investigate it (impartially). If I found it was warranted, I would apply an appropriate penalty to them as well.

You should really have no power to do any of that, after your expletive laden personal attacks in server chat.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not everyone agrees with you. You have been trying to force your rules since page one

And he was correct from page 1. The challenge was outdated (written pre-Velious) and included some glaring oversights.

You are not every one. If we're being honest, you're actually nobody.

You have already proven that you are not making any arguments here in good faith. Any authority you claim to have on the subject is not recognized, and for the time being, any feedback you might have on the subject will be disregarded.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is childish behavior, and hurts the wiki.

No THIS is childish behavior that hurts the wiki:

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And he was correct from page 1. The challenge was outdated (written pre-Velious) and included some glaring oversights.

You are not every one. If we're being honest, you're actually nobody.

You have already proven that you are not making any arguments here in good faith. Any authority you claim to have on the subject is not recognized, and for the time being, any feedback you might have on the subject will be disregarded.



No THIS is childish behavior that hurts the wiki:

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

More trolling. This just hurts you.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Point of order, can someone please let me know how ad hominem attacks from DSM can hurt me? I feel fine...

I am glad you feel healthy!

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

More trolling. This just hurts you.

Point of order, can someone please let me know how ad hominem attacks from DSM can hurt me? I feel fine...