Arizona election audit finds massive fraud and irregularities

[Gravydoo II]

Just google 74000 ballots and you'll see theres no MYSTERRRYYYY OOOHHHHH SPOOKKKYYYYY

Dumb as fuck. Its REALLY easy to explain how they have "no record of being sent". They were early voting ballots.. dumb as fuck. but daddy rape hands said they were magic ballots.. im sure you believe him over anyone so go with him. Cant wait til he dead and get to see how hillary killed him with an ice bullet from a jewish gun

[Gravydoo II]

Why did they take rudys law license?? For being TOO HONEST about the election??

HAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAA

[Thorgrimm]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just google 74000 ballots and you'll see theres no MYSTERRRYYYY OOOHHHHH SPOOKKKYYYYY

Dumb as fuck. Its REALLY easy to explain how they have "no record of being sent". They were early voting ballots.. dumb as fuck. but daddy rape hands said they were magic ballots.. im sure you believe him over anyone so go with him. Cant wait til he dead and get to see how hillary killed him with an ice bullet from a jewish gun

They don't keep records of ballots sent early?

Who told you that? Same people who said Russian Collusion and No Wuhan Lab Leak?

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

oh im sure that if you look at any state anywhere, from a group that has already said "there is corruption there! we know it! we KNOW IT!" thats not an "audit". Thats just being a dumb ass.

it's pretty funny these kids think they can pretend to be a neutral inquisitor while actively playing for the other team. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They don't keep records of ballots sent early?

Who told you that? Same people who said Russian Collusion and No Wuhan Lab Leak?

After the deadline to request a mail-in ballot, which was October 23 in 2020, the requested-ballot list doesn't get updated by the county. But the submitted-ballots list does get updated after that October 23 deadline -- with the votes of in-person early voters.

Archer analyzed the files and found that there were 74,241 ballots on the submitted-ballots list without a corresponding entry on the requested-ballots list -- nearly identical to the figure Logan cited, "74,243." But Archer found that more than 99.9% of the ballots in question were recorded in the submitted-ballots list on October 26 or later.
That is in line with the October 23 cut-off date Archer had previously noted for the requested-ballots list.
The explanation: October 24 and 25 were weekend days when county clerks didn't update the submitted-ballot list, Archer said, so they added the ballots cast by in-person voters on those weekend days to the submitted-ballot totals starting on October 26.
"This is a glaring omission in the analysis," Archer tweeted of the auditors. "It is either grossly negligent for failing to see a pattern of ballots being returned after a certain date or the statements were deliberately misleading."



took 5 seconds... but im not retarded.

So what was it about the ballots that concerned you, exactly??? Fucking retard... oh my god..

please, some kind of, gestapo come remove this trash from the earth. They have a learning machine before them but use it like derek zoolander.. your parents are ashamed of you, for sure.

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Based upon the discrepancies found in AZ so far and others that will probably be uncovered when additional states are audited like GA and PA, he didn't lose

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If there was massive provable fraud he didn't lose

Originally Posted by Thorgrimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think these audits are about overturning 2020

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Thorgrimm]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Horza]

Republicans are traitors who are more loyal to a pedophile billionaire than the country.

[Gravydoo II]

Birds of a feather.
They were always traitors.
They cant wait to commit treason for daddy rape.
If they are that stupid, imagine how stupid they are gonna be in 5 years.

[Thorgrimm]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After the deadline to request a mail-in ballot, which was October 23 in 2020, the requested-ballot list doesn't get updated by the county. But the submitted-ballots list does get updated after that October 23 deadline -- with the votes of in-person early voters.

Archer analyzed the files and found that there were 74,241 ballots on the submitted-ballots list without a corresponding entry on the requested-ballots list -- nearly identical to the figure Logan cited, "74,243." But Archer found that more than 99.9% of the ballots in question were recorded in the submitted-ballots list on October 26 or later.
That is in line with the October 23 cut-off date Archer had previously noted for the requested-ballots list.
The explanation: October 24 and 25 were weekend days when county clerks didn't update the submitted-ballot list, Archer said, so they added the ballots cast by in-person voters on those weekend days to the submitted-ballot totals starting on October 26.
"This is a glaring omission in the analysis," Archer tweeted of the auditors. "It is either grossly negligent for failing to see a pattern of ballots being returned after a certain date or the statements were deliberately misleading."



took 5 seconds... but im not retarded.

So what was it about the ballots that concerned you, exactly??? Fucking retard... oh my god..

please, some kind of, gestapo come remove this trash from the earth. They have a learning machine before them but use it like derek zoolander.. your parents are ashamed of you, for sure.

A lot of insults, but that's actually not the claim being made by the auditors

Looks like Archer is pulling some bait and switch on gullible people. He's responding to a claim that wasn't even made. I read through a lot of the supposed fact checks of this assertion and they are all carefully worded with this narrative.

The issue isn't request or submission

The issue is a record of the ballots ever being sent in the first place. Maricopa officials have yet to provide that data. It probably exists and I'm sure they have a record of it somewhere

Even in the hearing they said it could be a clerical error, but such a discrepancy requires the next step which is canvassing which makes sense.