******Official politics thread ******

[Lune]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Last I checked I wasn't able to provide any actual data with regard to flouride regulation in the brain though which is why it had no abstracts in the first place. And you are making a lot of presumptions.

It does seem pretty naive to assume that high levels of flouride in the brain aren't tilting cellular calcium in one direction or the other, given the eventual calcification of the pineal gland. My beef with you is that you are saying it DOESN'T as some sort of fact, and I am not necessarily saying I can prove that it DOES (within a 5 minute block of time).

You haven't backed up your claim it DOESN'T any more than I have backed up my claim that it DOES. So again back to my 5 star plan of you being a petty hypocritical bitch.

You're claiming something. I reviewed your claim and poked holes in it, because it goes against what I learned about calcium regulation. You've got nothing that supports your assertion of calcium channel up-regulation being a source of fluoride-related damage. I'm not claiming the opposite, and I don't need to. Rejecting your claim returns us to "I don't know".

If someone claims stars are made of cigarette smoke, it's not true until somebody proves what stars are made of, the claim can be proven false.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're claiming something. I reviewed your claim and poked holes in it, because it goes against what I learned about calcium regulation. You've got nothing that supports your assertion of calcium channel up-regulation being a source of fluoride-related damage. I'm not claiming the opposite. Rejecting your claim returns us to "I don't know".

Would you make the same counter-claim about magnesium in the brain?

Answer that one big boy.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Would you make the same counter-claim about magnesium in the brain?

Answer that one big boy.

I don't know anything about magnesium

[AzzarTheGod]

No counter claim, but you said the endocrine system is capable of balancing it all out, so I guess there is no need to be concerned about flouride accumulation in the brain or calcium itself.

You insinuated flouride must have no effect on cellular calcium balance. Would you make the same claim about high levels of magnesium? No because you would be a real moran then.

Flouride eats magnesium, and they both have influences on calcium. Flouride could be eating cellular magnesium in the brain (if its eating magnesium though, it could be eating a number of things. CITED study despite the URL name http://fluoridealert.org/studies/magnesium/ ) and that could be the cause for stunted IQ in general.

its toxic, its probably stealing cellular neuro minerals and rendering a number of metals inactive, magnesium just being one of them.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Flouride eats magnesium

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

its toxic

In large doses. Not sure what that has to do with water you're drinking from a municipal supply that hasn't been mismanaged or polluted to shit.

If you want to be convincing, find a study that links the trace levels of fluoride supplemented for public health reasons to any negative health effects. That's what I would need to see to go "Oh shit this fluoride being added to our water on purpose is bad"

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



In large doses. Not sure what that has to do with water you're drinking from a municipal supply that hasn't been mismanaged or polluted to shit.

If you want to be convincing, find a study that links the trace levels of fluoride supplemented for public health reasons to any negative health effects. That's what I would need to see to go "Oh shit this fluoride being added to our water on purpose is bad"

Define "trace" since you can't account for the flouride level in the first place throughout the various distribution areas in the water supply. So your request criteria is bullshit to begin with.

its complete guesswork by the government. Good one though.

[AzzarTheGod]

Drastic increases in flouride uptake in the intestinal tract dependent on a very critical trace mineral that you have likely heard of http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/...9727-109-27275

proven intestinal absorption. the more I see, the more its obvious why the studies are not readily available. It would result in de-flouridation of the water supply overnight.

[Xaanka]

islamic truck of peace and cultural enrichment

reminder france is perfectly fine guys jarnooga was totally right about this one definitely nothing to see here

[AzzarTheGod]

1 sec xaanka im still planking on some asses here

[AzzarTheGod]

If you know anything about dental school, they teach drill and destroy. Cause problems, take healthy tooth and as much as possible. They have no interest in teeth, they are not medical doctors. They deal in mercury.

Keep sucking a fake sciences dick (Dentistry) and letting them tell you they really care about your teeth staying healthy. Protip: they don't, which is why dentistry is largely based around causing maximum damage to the teeth during a so-called cavity. It is a for-profit science, its based around making money off of teeth problems.

Lune is not that woke today.