Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2013, 04:58 PM
49shadesofgay 49shadesofgay is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baramur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sunra/Mithra got his shield back, you an gladly ask him. Not sure how one can prove one way or another, and i guess maybe that was alarti intentions the whole time i cannot say. Unfortunately no items are nodrop where you could post the log of them looting the item and still having the item, TMO said they would recieve loot from the kill, so i guess a screenshot of them receiving items from Sirken would prove it in their case, but will not happen, as i have stated the loot was already returned.
That's some pretty weak proof. There should be screenshots of discussions with GMs, screenshots of petitions forums, or GM confirmation.

None of these things should be so hard to obtain, I'm afraid without them I must agree with Alarti and simply be patient, however if either side is unable to prove definitavely then neither side can technically lose the wager.
  #2  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:03 PM
baramur baramur is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

You see the burden of proof lies with Alarti. The best was not who got the loot, but that TMO would get the loot, which they will not because it has already been awarded to the rightful people FE. The guild that KILLED the dragons. TMO called us weak when we started. They said we only get loot by sniping. They said we had to rely on them to kill dragons for us. Now it would seem TMO is relying on FE to kill dragons for their loot. They were out mobilized, we killed the dragons, and Alarti ran his arrogant mouth to the sum of 100k and a green dragon scale. Hey don't want to honor your word and pay fine with me, its 100k, if thats what your name is worth so be it. No hard feelings, and im serious, none at all, if its to much for you, then by all means bail out. Good Luck on future raids TMO, i actually do enjoy the competition. /salute.
  #3  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:08 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by baramur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You see the burden of proof lies with Alarti. The best was not who got the loot, but that TMO would get the loot, which they will not because it has already been awarded to the rightful people FE. The guild that KILLED the dragons. TMO called us weak when we started. They said we only get loot by sniping. They said we had to rely on them to kill dragons for us. Now it would seem TMO is relying on FE to kill dragons for their loot. They were out mobilized, we killed the dragons, and Alarti ran his arrogant mouth to the sum of 100k and a green dragon scale. Hey don't want to honor your word and pay fine with me, its 100k, if thats what your name is worth so be it. No hard feelings, and im serious, none at all, if its to much for you, then by all means bail out. Good Luck on future raids TMO, i actually do enjoy the competition. /salute.
There is alot of misinformation in there. Maybe you are disregarding the evidence.? Did you see the Trak or Fay videos? I did.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #4  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:09 PM
49shadesofgay 49shadesofgay is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
Default

I'm aware of the wording of the bet, as I'm sure Alarti is and you should have been. Without proof that the loot is NOT going back to TMO, either via failed petitions - GM confirmation, or some other unambigous evidence, then FE has -0% chance of ever winning the bet.

Likewise, if Alarti wishes to win the bet, he is required to post the same evidence that the loot did go to TMO, or a GM ruling that is going to be turned over to TMO, or something in a similar vein.

The burden of proof lies with whoever wishes to win the bet.

Post some and you may have some shred of credibility. Keep bitching about it without posting proof and you come-off as retarded as Alarti.

Do you really want to come-off ass retarded as Alarti?

By all means though, keep calling each other names or whatever retarded shit it is you people do on these forums, but some proof and a verdict one way or another would be far more interesting. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #5  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:09 PM
Hitchens Hitchens is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 376
Default

Those who hate Alarti aren't going to stop hating him over honoring an Internet bet, therefore the most rational course of action is to stir up drama and refuse to honor it.
  #6  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:12 PM
49shadesofgay 49shadesofgay is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitchens [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Those who hate Alarti aren't going to stop hating him over honoring an Internet bet, therefore the most rational course of action is to stir up drama and refuse to honor it.
This is not completely true. As a fair and balanced individual I would gain a great amount of respect for both Alarti and TMO if it were to be proven in a credible fashion that FE has won that bet and Alarti were to pay honor his word.
  #7  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:13 PM
Hitchens Hitchens is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 376
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 49shadesofgay [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As a balanced individual.
No one believes that.
  #8  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:09 PM
Daldolma Daldolma is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 644
Default

if he doesn't pay, he should be labeled a scammer to the community and possibly banned as many other scammers are

ban dem pixels
  #9  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:13 PM
49shadesofgay 49shadesofgay is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
Default

I'm sure I'm not the only one too!

Feel free to make another poll!
  #10  
Old 03-01-2013, 05:15 PM
49shadesofgay 49shadesofgay is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 18
Default

The man in my avatar is far more likely to be the next commander and chief than the woman in your avatar.

Wanna fight about it?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:36 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.