Agatha is Visage

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by TotallyLegit [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Big words from someone who can't discern an ear from background.

pretty sure you got me confused with relapse, but ty for your concern.

[freez]

man yall fucked up

[Bardalicious]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

sigh, let me put this to you succinctly:

a) the idea that agatha should have any ulterior motive to post pictures of herself is inherently salacious
b) the idea that agatha is in fact a man masquerading as a woman is also salacious
c) implying that anyone white knighting agatha is also salacious, assuming you actually know what white knighting is

and also, i've conveniently linked any confusing words included in this post in case you need assistance looking up their definitions

That was a whole lot of effort to save face dude. You're making a fuck of a lot of assumptions based entirely off of an innocent question posed to her.

1. Never made the claim she had an ulterior motive. The question was why she fucking cared enough to post a picture for these known degenerates in the first place. The answer to which is pretty fucking obvious if you've read through all of her posts after she has made some pretty absurd attention-seeking statements.
2. Never made the claim she is in fact a man. You're still making absurd stretches to continue to argue.
3. You're still white knighting. You're asserting that a picture of a female on the internet is inherently considered a sexual matter. Are you confusing sex with gender?

You've gone through extensive lengths to degrade Clear for posting his picture(s). Yet you continue to attempt to defend Agatha from some perceived wrongs she has endured from a simple fucking question. One might infer that you're doing so based entirely off of the gender of said person. Please tell me again which of us is acting with salacious intent?

Shut the fuck up and stick to picking on the mentally inept. You're not even in my ballpark son.

[freez]

yo bard you argue with any fuck nut that pokes you.


shits funny.

but did not read.

[Bardalicious]

Originally Posted by freez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yo bard you argue with any fuck nut that pokes you.


shits funny.

but did not read.

welcome 2 rants n flames my negro

[Bardalicious]

RnF is like text-based pvp adventures.

Sometimes you just gotta drop an ice comet on someones face.

[Instagib]

Agatha is a girl and is decent looking plus a nice person. Shit's classic.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was a whole lot of effort to save face dude. You're making a fuck of a lot of assumptions based entirely off of an innocent question posed to her.

1. Never made the claim she had an ulterior motive. The question was why she fucking cared enough to post a picture for these known degenerates in the first place. The answer to which is pretty fucking obvious if you've read through all of her posts after she has made some pretty absurd attention-seeking statements.

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yet you continue to attempt to defend Agatha from some perceived wrongs she has endured from a simple fucking question. One might infer that you're doing so based entirely off of the gender of said person. Please tell me again which of us is acting with salacious intent?

i've grouped these pieces together. you seemed to have some break in your logic. i've fixed it.

i've already admitted you might have left me confused with your word choice and framing. but you decided to badger and belittle me over it. and now it's my turn.

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

2. Never made the claim she is in fact a man. You're still making absurd stretches to continue to argue.

you're confused. i never said you did, you mentioned the possibility that somebody might, and that would be salacious.

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3. You're still white knighting. You're asserting that a picture of a female on the internet is inherently considered a sexual matter.

white knighting is inherently considered sexual in nature. yes.

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you confusing sex with gender?

once again, i think you're the one confused here.

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You've gone through extensive lengths to degrade Clear for posting his picture(s).

my issue with clEAR wasn't his ear, if you were paying attention. once again, you're the one confused, not me.

Originally Posted by Bardalicious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shut the fuck up and stick to picking on the mentally inept. You're not even in my ballpark son.

i'm sorry, i didn't mean to interrupt your tball game.

[Bardalicious]

Verbally eviscerated.

Resorts to: lol no u confused *****

[Samoht]

yeah you really should invest in some vocabulary lessons because you clearly don't understand the word eviscerated.