#31
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#32
|
||||
|
Our goal was to engage the players hiding behind mobs hoping to avoid pvp. We had no aggro until fully commiting after the drop down.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
#33
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#34
|
|||
|
Denying guerilla warfare is a shame. Training is one thing, but dispelling should be allowed regardless of numbers. When are we getting the FTE ruleset?
__________________
Wind/Piece
'Making you disappear quicker than a pushbike in Erudin' | ||
|
#35
|
|||
|
OOR dispeller for sure shouldn't be a thing but how is an in range character dispelling any person or mob not solvable with PVP?
What defines a force in this instance? Whether or not you have a force to take on the mob seems inconsequential if your goal is pvp, so I don't really get why that caveat is there.
__________________
Gradner Goodtimes - 60 Bard | ||
|
#36
|
|||
|
In empire we encountered people dispelling our slow. We pvped and just killed the mob still
| ||
|
#37
|
||||
|
Because instead of just solving the situation through pvp means their initial thought was to get cylock to suspend the naked pellers. All that was needed was one bard aoe mesing instead they took their best dps off doze for the whole fight then wiped when the clerics ran out of mana. It's easier to cry and get new rules made then to adapt and overcome.
Hope this trend doesn't continue would love to be able to pvp without fear a bunny will aggro me and I'll eat a suspension.
__________________
Quote:
| |||
|
#38
|
|||
|
Few guys in a plane dispelled 140k people in nagasaki japan and that resulted in us having everquest
| ||
|
#39
|
|||||
|
Quote:
This rule is only being created because the current "top guild" is a bunch of spaghetti spined goat blowers that couldn't raid pvp their way out of a wet paper bag. Quote:
This is also correct. | ||||
|
#40
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cylock, I think a new sticky thread with the current set of rules on Red 99 would be beneficial and is pretty much what the entire server is asking for | |||
|
|
|