![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Much of this comes down to a wine tasters preference, not a bottleneck of progression. Nobody would argue a kflame is better than willsapper but it is “viable”? Of course. Also if you have one with a warrior you probably have an epic and a bag of other weapons so it’s a moot point.
More is viable on p99 in 2024 than was imaginable on live during Velious…this is an overtuned fever dream of nostalgia. I would tend to avoid trading the currency of absolutes. It’s just a matter of time until people find yet another way to crack this pixelated nut if no other reason than boredom. If a few rogues die for science, all the better. | ||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I'm still trying to figure out how we did Vulak on live. Pre-luclin. My guild only had 70 players on for raids and only 3 of those were rogues but we managed it twice before the moon opened. Server was slow to progress at the time but we were #1. #2 was a horde that could field 250 but they never even managed to kill aary.
| ||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
On live I didn’t parse but had a Vyemm dagger rogue. Based on experience with aggro and concern I’d be yelled at by raid leaders, I just waited until 95% to jump in. This worked very well. Geared out monks and rogues here probably do the same. I do my ranger when BFG’ing. Knights and most rangers shouldn’t be concerned after 99-98%. Counting procs and lawnchair quarterbacking the warrior’s choice of weapons won’t change much…they won’t want your constructive feedback lol. Unless clickies or spells are involved melee aggro and melee dps more or less are on a curve. The curve of a red blade primary and proc offhand though is a much less smooth and RNG dependant than the curve than say a Willsapper/Nevs horn. Unfortunately once the threshold of dps aggro overcomes tank aggro that dps often takes a dirt nap. Unless they can quickly back out of range from a rooted raid mob or have an idol/FD ready to click. | |||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
If you could take a group of average p99 raiders knowing what they know and geared as they are into a Time Machine and put them on live servers before Luclin - content would be a cake walk.
__________________
| |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Shortsword*
You can’t improve on perfection. | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
It begs the question is DEX being undervalued for end game tanks?
My rogue can pull agro off any warrior I've seen (willsapper/red blade, ect). Using just the zlexak dagger (procs) and epic offhand. Haven't tested it against a tank that has a Sceptre of Destruction, but pretty sure I got them beat too going all in. The one thing everyone is in agreement on is that proc agro is the most effective way to build the most amount of threat. Maybe the answer lies in optimizing +DEX as much as optimising between the handful of generally agreed upon best agro weapons. I know, I know...HP and AC are key but just maybe there's some min/maxing that can be done with DEX to build an agro warrior that can rival knights. | ||
![]() |
|
|