#31
|
|||
|
They were last night and look what happened.
The population majority (their guild) would not stand for it. | ||
|
#32
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#33
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Xantille Cares
I fuk ur mouth since 2001 | |||
|
#34
|
|||
|
OH MY BAD. I saw the other 10 posts or nirgons poop pictures and got confused. Dumbass.
| ||
|
#35
|
|||
|
sounds like lots of fun in fear bros !
| ||
|
#36
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#37
|
|||
|
You guys sound like a bunch kids who lost a crayon out of there box, Get over it, deal with it, play smarter
No Offense to Amelinda but I give her 1 month before you toolboxes drive her to quit. Then who are you all going to cry to? I bet she feels like the playground monitor at a mental retardation school. | ||
|
#38
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now he's doing it here. Lol mad and still bad | |||
|
#39
|
|||
|
who has been suspended for training?!?!?
| ||
|
#40
|
|||
|
As was discussed a million times, just allow training in raid zones.
http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=33605 http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=46129 Really, what you rule on training won't matter in the end. Regardless of the legality of trains, every high-end PvP engagement is going to end up in trains. Neither fraps nor having a GM present at every battle will stop this. Claiming to enforce training and then clearly not leads to perceived GM favoritism. Perceived GM favoritism will cause people to quit in disgust more than being trained will since you actually have recourse to being trained (you know, training back). | ||
|
|
|