Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: should the server have a hands off/no rules policy?
yes, personal responsibility and playerbase solving own problems 29 60.42%
no, i am a moron and plan to vote for obama 19 39.58%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:20 AM
Flunklesnarkin Flunklesnarkin is offline
Planar Protector

Flunklesnarkin's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Best America
Posts: 1,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
ninjalooting, trade ganking, scamming, training, xp lossing, stranding warriors in hate and so on should. imo be approached with a hands off tough shit mindset as they were on sullon (and for all but training, on rz as well)

tired of seeing/hearing about the latest ruling on what is or is not allowed and the various shades of gray cast as a result, the only truly fair ruleset is no ruleset.


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #32  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:23 AM
Null Null is offline
VIP / Contributor

Null's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
everything i mentioned IS classic to have GMs not interfere.
I have personally been banned or had guildies banned for everything on your list outside of stranding people in Hate. It didn't happen often, mostly because banning people meant losing revenue but it did happen.
  #33  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:25 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

as an aside one could note that those for getting staff out of the affairs of the server are well known folks in game or on the boards, and those against are retards from the blue server, 20 post alt accounts and nihilum members.

predictable to say the least.
  #34  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:28 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Null [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I have personally been banned or had guildies banned for everything on your list outside of stranding people in Hate. It didn't happen often, mostly because banning people meant losing revenue but it did happen.
you also personally had red full resists on single effect nukes that never happened throughout the entire duration of launch through velious.

i have screenshots of ozuri (lead gm of RZ) squirreled away somewhere telling me tradeganking was legal after i shitcanned someone during a gbs "trade" in neriak for thousands of plat.

ninjalooting was a regular occurance on RZ among all of the raid sects and nobody ever got banned for it.

instead people were banned for things like "zoneline camping"
  #35  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:30 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Well known cheaters...yeah. Seriously, every single one.
  #36  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:32 AM
Darwoth Darwoth is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 614
Default

in fact the policies on such were clear.....

"scamming", if you willingly gave another player an item or your login you were shit out of luck

ninjalooting, was considered part of raid security to prevent it

tradeganking, you were expected to be careful and take precautions against it (gems for example)

training was the only thing i mentioned that got people a gm response, and even that did not apply on sullon.


your either full of shit, played long after sony took over the game or had GMs operating on a whole different set of rules on the (team?) server you played on.
  #37  
Old 02-25-2012, 01:58 AM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Being right all the time gets so boring...
  #38  
Old 02-25-2012, 02:11 AM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Worst thing that can happen to a game is a staff failing to enforce rules equally.

This server is in the toilet.
  #39  
Old 02-25-2012, 02:25 AM
Lazortag Lazortag is offline
Planar Protector

Lazortag's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Worst thing that can happen to a game is a staff failing to enforce rules equally.

This server is in the toilet.
Boo hoo. God forbid you try to be reasonable with a GM instead of going full retard on the forums the second things don't go your way. It was the exact same way after you were disbanded for exploiting Naggy, you guys tried to play the victim when you were in the wrong in the first place. When you do something wrong and you're caught red handed, the correct response is contrition. Your response however was to bitch as much as possible about unequal treatment. And that is why no one will ever take you seriously - you could have probably solved all of your woes by politely speaking with a GM but instead you chose to do what Holo does best: whining publicly.
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity>
Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter
Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior

Project 1999 (PvP):
[50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis
  #40  
Old 02-25-2012, 02:28 AM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,186
Default

nah I had doubts about this server when holo was banned for using known nihilum strats. was totally confused and thought there was something else behind it. nope just full retard decisions being made by people without a clue.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.