So this is actually a big deal.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So when was the last time someone had a bail condition that said "you can't talk to any republican?"

How does that matter? The case is unique and the bail conditions are unique.

And your equivalence between anarchists and Republicans/Democrats is ridiculous. There are > 50 million registered Republicans and even more Democrats. You literally cannot avoid them. Anarchists are few and far between; it's a substantively lesser restriction.

As already stated, civil rights can be and regularly are abridged in release agreements. The court is not obligated to grant bail and the accused isn't obligated to accept the terms of his bail. If he doesn't like it, he can sit in jail while awaiting trial. That's the position you're in when you're charged with a felony. It's best to not be charged with a felony.

[Littlegyno 9.0]

A judge can require, as condition to the person's release, an individual follow certain conditions. Most the time, these conditions include no illegal drugs, excessive alcohol, no contact with alleged victim or witnesses, and no possessing firearms.

Does this mean that the judge is overstepping their authority and infringing on the rights of the accused. Of course not, the accused has every right not to accept and spend time in jail waiting trial. This is in no way out of the ordinary considering this negroid's political affiliations.

Let's look at the definition of anarchist.
an·ar·chist [an-er-kist]
noun
1.
a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.
2.
a person who seeks to overturn by violence all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, with no purpose of establishing any other system of order in the place of that destroyed.
3.
a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom.

Obviously this negroid is in favor of the violent overthrow of the U.S. Government. This judge should not have granted bail. Regardless since he did, he is well within his rights to restrict his communication to ANYONE he sees fit, until the trial is concluded. If he's found not guilty, he can be free to resume any association he feels he wants to.

[Littlegyno 9.0]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, that definition of anarchism is juvenile and informed by an obvious statist bias, IDC what dictionary you got it from.

Cool, let's get one from Merriam-Webster:
Definition of ANARCHIST

1
: a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or ruling power
2
: a person who believes in, advocates, or promotes anarchism or anarchy; especially : one who uses violent means to overthrow the established order

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anarchist

Obviously this negroid throwing a firebomb at a police car can't be considered anarcho-pacifism right? This guy obviously advocates for the violent overthrow of the U.S. government. He should spend 20 years in jail for this.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

[Littlegyno 9.0]

BTW, regardless of what the police do to a movement, nonviolence is the ethically and correct way to attempt to enact change. You're a fucking retard negroid thinking this guy is some sort of model.

The civil rights movement experienced this same type of violent retaliation. These violent negroids dishonor previous movements with their negroid behaviors.

[Littlegyno 9.0]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still not addressing the issue. Gee, I wonder why.

No, I am addressing the issues, you're just a condescending dipshit who thinks reading Reddit articles makes you a special snowflake.

THE JUDGE HAS EVERY AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT COMMUNICATION TO ANY PARTY AS CONDITION TO THE BAIL.

IF A MOBSTER IS ARRESTED, AND GRANTED BAIL, DO YOU THINK THE JUDGE WOULD NOT RESTRICT COMMUNICATION TO KNOWN GANG MEMBERS?

God damn you fat fucking whale. You are dense as fuck. Those 5 Associate's degrees don't seem to have done shit for you huh?

[Littlegyno 9.0]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll accept your point when u show me a single case where bail conditions included "don't talk to any republican."

Has a republican affiliated group advocated the violent overthrow of the U.S. Government?

If an individual from a Christian Right organization firebombed a car/abortion clinic/something else, the judge would have every right to restrict communication. Communication with a specific group is not an inherent right when you are undergoing a criminal trial.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll accept your point when u show me a single case where bail conditions included "don't talk to any republican."

This is either phenomenal trolling or startling stupidity.

[Littlegyno 9.0]

Originally Posted by Lemmy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"anarchists" is not a specific group fucktard.

So your issue is that the order is non-specific instead of a specific bail condition like "No contact with convicted felons" etc?

[Daldolma]

His issue is apparently that this is an atypical bail condition. Why that matters in his mind is still uncertain.

[Littlegyno 9.0]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

His issue is apparently that this is an atypical bail condition. Why that matters in his mind is still uncertain.

Because he's implying that this negroid is being oppressed by a meanie judge because of his ties to anarchist movements and probably Occupy organizations.

Basically, Hasbinbad is a ******.