Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Gloomlord]

Do you think I'm obsessed with a class to such a degree that I'm going to place them in a situation where they're made redundant and weak, and then call them an excellent class? Even though the vast majority of us in this thread proclaimed them to be the 2nd most powerful class in the game, and where even I stated they surpassed Enchanter with enough gear and Puppet Strings.

Come now, DSM. I call your bluff. The power of the lie has its limits. It has worn thin by now. You're just a coward with too frail of an ego to admit something so inconsequential it baffles me.

People fight feverishly over religion and politics. People fight to survive and to be recognised and cherished. What are you fighting over so zealously about?

About an innocuous discussion about a composition in a very old game that is easy to figure out. This is why you've dragged a thread out so long despite nearly everyone disagreeing with you? You couldn't be more pathetic if you tried...

Edit: Oh, yes. I am very angry with you. Why? Does pointing that out make you look less pathetic?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you think I'm obsessed with a class to such a degree that I'm going to place them in a situation where they're made redundant and weak, and then call them an excellent class? Even though the vast majority of us in this thread proclaimed them to be the 2nd most powerful class in the game, and where even I stated they surpassed Enchanter with enough gear and Puppet Strings.

Come now, DSM. I call your bluff. The power of the lie has its limits. It has worn thin by now. You're just a coward with too frail of an ego to admit something so inconsequential it baffles me.

People fight feverishly over religion and politics. People fight to survive and to be recognised and cherished. What are you fighting over so zealously about?

About an innocuous discussion about a composition in a very old game that is easy to figure out. This is why you've dragged a thread out so long despite nearly everyone disagreeing with you? You couldn't be more pathetic if you tried...

Thank you for proving my point yet again.

300+ Trolling posts.
0 Evidence based posts.

You can start to improve your score at any time.

[Gloomlord]

Notice how you didn't try to deconstruct a single thing I said?

Because you know I'm right about you.

P.S Stop stealth editing. It makes you look even more manipulative than you already are.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Notice how you didn't try to deconstruct a single thing I said?

Because you know I'm right about you.

You aren't saying anything of value. That is why I don't need to deconstruct it.

If you think I am wrong, please provide evidence for your claims.

Providing sufficient evidence to back up your claim will convince everybody I am wrong, even if you think I won't admit it. So far you don't have any evidence for that assumption, since I have admitted to being wrong plenty of times on this forum already.

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

P.S Stop stealth editing. It makes you look even more manipulative than you already are.

You are always so negative. I edit my posts because people here typically seem to misread what I say. I need to try and be as clear as possible.

[Gloomlord]

Why are you here, then?

There's no purpose for you being here now than to protect your fragile ego.

Am I wrong?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why are you here, then?

There's no purpose for you being here now than to protect your fragile ego.

Am I wrong?

You should be asking yourself this question. If you really thought I was wrong, you would have provided evidence long ago to prove it.

Instead, you keep posting the same psychoanalytic nonsense in an attempt to undermine the argument because you have no evidence.

[Gloomlord]

Noone is agreeing with you, you understand that? Even the people who defended you think you're incorrect.

If we're all idiots, then why stay any longer?

Oh, that "psychoanalytic nonsense"? You mean calling out a vile personality when I see it?

I don't need a degree to figure you out.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Noone is agreeing with you, you understand that? Even the people who defended you think you're incorrect.

If we're all idiots, then why stay any longer?

Oh, that "psychoanalytic nonsense"? You mean calling out a vile personality when I see it?

I don't need a degree to figure you out.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum - It's a fallacy.

I will be happy to admit I am wrong if you can provide evidence. Everybody wins. People reading this forum get concrete data, and you can gloat that I was wrong. I really don't care about being correct. I just want people to have the correct information.

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You should be asking yourself this question. If you really thought I was wrong, you would have provided evidence long ago to prove it.

Instead, you keep posting the same psychoanalytic nonsense in an attempt to undermine the argument because you have no evidence.

Troxx provided real mage group dps data.

The ball has always been in your court. You never provided anything similar other than a single mob solo video which has nothing to do with anything relevant/requested.

So until that point, nobody needs to provide you with evidence. The more you continue to not provide this, the less credible you become.

I am still willing to provide my enchanter to test this. So as soon as you want to set this up, let me know.

[Gloomlord]

I knew you were going to say that. But you're missing the point, which you can't seem to address:

Why are you still here if we're all wrong?

Forget the appeal to the majority fallacy. Answer the question. I'm not arguing that more people = truth here.