Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Ripqozko]

This is what Kittens has turned into, a guild full of DSM. Join at your own risk.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is what Kittens has turned into, a guild full of DSM. Join at your own risk.

He just repeats the same nonsense message in random threads. It continues to be ignored. I'm still interested to see what his next message is, he randomly changes them from time to time. They've all been ignored so far, so I don't have much hope for the next one.

It's bad trolling from a proven troll.

https://project1999.com/forums/showp...&postcount=367

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I troll lot but even I tried having a normal conversation with some good info based on my experience with gear. Sta is not as easy to max on a DE. If I went int I’d be in a super hole. Even atm I need like vulak bracer to cap with 1h.

Edit: all he did was shit on it even tho I showed what I have

He doesn't like when people disagree with him, so he trolls.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

No. You have not named a single camp that needs (ie requires and can’t otherwise be done without) a shaman.

You said you could name a few.

Sorry you made a claim that cannot be backed up and are trying to walk it back and move goalposts.

See what happened there?

Hypocrisy

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No. You have not named a single camp that needs (ie requires and can’t otherwise be done without) a shaman.

You said you could name a few.

Sorry you made a claim that cannot be backed up and are trying to walk it back and move goalposts.

See what happened there?

Hypocrisy

You are just playing word games with the word need, because you couldn't answer my original question about what camps need a Cleric. You admitted no camp needs a Cleric.

This is a common tactic of yours, because you cannot argue on the substance of the discussion

You are taking the extreme interpretation of the word need, while I was not. Nor did I ever say this should be the extreme interpretation.

People will often say "you need a Cleric for Xenovorash so the Warrior can stay alive". The word need is true enough in the context of how people play the game, they understand what you meant by need.

Taking the extreme interpretation of the word need would mean you would disagree, because a Warrior could be kept alive against Xenovorash if you had 100 Druids patch healing in a chain. Its not normal to take the extreme interpretation of the word "need" on these grounds in normal conversation about game mechanics.

Now, go back and read what I said. You'll find the camps.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are just playing word games with the word need,.

What??? lol

Words do have actual definitions …

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/need

In this case you used the version of “need” that was a transitive verb. And don’t feed be BS about extreme vs soft “definitions”. You said there aren’t camps that need clerics followed by the claim that you could name several camps that need a shaman.

Are you insane? Smoking crack? Or is English a second language for you?

Like literally wtf lol

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What??? lol

Words do have actual definition …

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/need

In this case you used the version of “need” that was a transitive verb

Are you insane? Or is English a second language for you?

You didn't read my post.

If someone says "You need a Cleric for Xenovorash", would you counter by saying: " You don't need a Cleric, because 100 druids could chain heal the Warrior instead?"

You don't seem to understand the language if you think people nevery say something like "You need a Cleric for Xenovorash", even though this is not true with the extreme interpretation.

There are common uses of words that don't follow the definition precisely. You should know this.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What??? lol

Words do have actual definitions …

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/need

In this case you used the version of “need” that was a transitive verb. And don’t feed be BS about extreme vs soft “definitions”. You said there aren’t camps that need clerics followed by the claim that you could name several camps that need a shaman.

Are you insane? Smoking crack? Or is English a second language for you?

Like literally wtf lol

Here is a simple example of two different players using the word "need" more like the word "want" in the same context, and the first example is clearly transitive:

[Fri Jun 21 10:57:18 2019] Aaxion tells the guild, 'king group - need a monk'

[Wed Dec 26 21:22:34 2018] Nogok tells the guild, 'monk needed for king'

Fungi King does not absolutely require a Monk for the kill. Nor are they claiming Fungi King absolutely requires a Monk for the kill. Aaxion and Nogok want a Monk because Monks are generally the preferred puller for Fungi King when compared to other classes. People sometimes use the word "need" as a more forceful "want". This is because "need" is a four level word with more force. Saying "We need a Monk" is faster than adding an adjective to want, like "We really want a Monk".

Are you able to admit you are wrong on such a simple point as this?

This is why I have to edit my posts. You will latch on to absolutely anything you can so you can twist it. Merely saying a word that triggers you will send you into a trolling frenzy. Just look at the example questions in my latest posts. You got distracted on the word "me", and you got distracted on the specific encounter. You missed the entire substance of the question, and then refused to answer it.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

adding an adjective to want

Just so you don't get distracted on this, I meant to say adverb.

[Troxx]

It’s ok. It’s not the first time you’ve very confidently stated bullshit that simply wasn’t true.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

With enough Clerics any class can survive AoW. You usually just don't have guilds fielding 100+ Clerics.

Remember that gem? You say weird, blatantly untrue crap all the time … and you do so with such certainty.

It is hilarious.

Oh yeah, also check my sig.