religion

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Yes it's known as "margin of error" and the % correlation is not only relevant, it's the entire purpose of doing the experiment. Science is about predictions. You are still not talking about science.

Having a hypotheses isn't exclusive to the scientific method anymore than wings are exclusive to airplanes.

Please learn the error in how you continue to conflate everything.

[iruinedyourday]

FUCK THIS THREAD

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently you don't know what an assumption is, and it's even more how ignorant you are with your response. You asked me to provide something and I did.

I didnt ask you to shoehorn your religion into a scientific experiment. I ask how the particular example I provided was in any way similar to a religion. You STILL havent answered my question. Reading comprehension...something you lack.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes it's known as "margin of error" and the % correlation is not only relevant, it's the entire purpose of doing the experiment. Science is about predictions. You are still not talking about science.

Having a hypotheses isn't exclusive to the scientific method anymore than wings are exclusive to airplanes.

Please learn the error in how you continue to conflate everything.

How are you guys not getting this. NONE OF THIS MATTER. He wanted a concept compared to the criteria he gave, and it was given, and instead, retards like you jump back into the convo like "LOL WHAT!?" It's like you didn't even read anything.

This is what you guys see.

Eliseus arguing God exists.

Random person saying something that I agree with

Eliseus arguing Gd exists.

Random person saying something else that I agree with.

Eliseus still arguing God exists.

Random person saying something more to contradict that though.

Eliseus still arguing God exists. Why doesn't he just get God doesn't exist.

Random person saying more stuff.

Does Eliseus ever stop with God exists.

Random people laugh because at Eliseus in agreement.

Eliseus still arguing God exists why?

It's just like what? Though I strongly believe in God, I have not only claimed that you must all bow down and believe in God, but have given counter arguments based off logic.

Eliseus still arguing God exists. Will probably claim this entire posts is "I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN GOD."

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You posted the definitions for faith, belief, and religion. That isnt an answer to my question at all. Here I will ask for the third time:

1. Observe something then ask a question - "I wonder how big Earth is..."

2. Think of an experiment to determine an answer to that question - "With some fancy math and measurements of shadows from two locations that are far apart I can answer this!"

3. Conduct the experiment

4. Have others repeat the experiment to confirm the results. If they match up to yours...congrats. You just solved a question using the scientific method.

Tell me, Eliseus, why do you consider this process anything remotely similar to a religion?

lawls, my reading comprehension is super hard.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How are you guys not getting this. NONE OF THIS MATTER. He wanted a concept compared to the criteria he gave, and it was given, and instead, retards like you jump back into the convo like "LOL WHAT!?" It's like you didn't even read anything.

This is what you guys see.

Eliseus arguing God exists.

Random person saying something that I agree with

Eliseus arguing Gd exists.

Random person saying something else that I agree with.

Eliseus still arguing God exists.

Random person saying something more to contradict that though.

Eliseus still arguing God exists. Why doesn't he just get God doesn't exist.

Random person saying more stuff.

Does Eliseus ever stop with God exists.

Random people laugh because at Eliseus in agreement.

Eliseus still arguing God exists why?

It's just like what? Though I strongly believe in God, I have not only claimed that you must all bow down and believe in God, but have given counter arguments based off logic.

Eliseus still arguing God exists. Will probably claim this entire posts is "I STRONGLY BELIEVE IN GOD."

Do you acknowledge that your God may not exist?

[leewong]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The evolution of man is not only a guess, but a very wild one; and it is totally unsupported by any convincing arguments. It can be mathematically demonstrated to be an impossible theory. Every proof of the unity of the human race in the days of Adam or Noah shatters the theory of the evolution of man.

If the evolution of the human race be true, there must have been, hundreds of thousands of years ago, a great multitude of heads of the race, in many parts of the earth, without one common language or religion. The present population of the globe proves that mankind must have descended from one pair who lived not earlier than the time of Noah.

The unity of languages also proves one common head about the same time. Certain beliefs and customs, common to various religions, point to one original God-given religion in historic time, in contrast to the evolution idea of many religions invented by ape-men in millions of years. The history of the world and the migration of nations point to one locality where the human race began in times not more remote, and show that man was created in a civilized state, and, therefore, never was a brute. If evolution were true, there would have been many billion times as many human beings as now exist, a great multitude of invented languages with little or no similarity, a vast number of invented religions with little, if anything, in common. Even the sciences invented and exploited by evolutionists, the Mendelian Inheritance Law and Biometry, also prove evolution impossible.

I will await your response as to how ignorant I am.

You keep making claims but you havent provided any evidence yet. Just wild assertions from creationists websites and answersingenisis.com that have long been discredited. Look up every single claim you just made and type the word debunked after it in google. I am not going to waste my time on this garbage.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You keep making claims but you havent provided any evidence yet. Just wild assertions from creationists websites and answersingenisis.com that have long been discredited. Look up every single claim you just made and type the word debunked after it in google. I am not going to waste my time on this garbage.

This is coming from the same guy that didn't provide a single piece of evidence when evolution was brought up earlier in the thread. Just saying.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is coming from the same guy that didn't provide a single piece of evidence when evolution was brought up earlier in the thread. Just saying.

Just because you refuse to accept the plethora of peer-reviewed studies that back up evolutionary theory, that doesn't suddenly make them any less evidential.

[paulgiamatti]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's just like what? Though I strongly believe in God, I have not only claimed that you must all bow down and believe in God, but have given counter arguments based off logic.

Stop. Conflating. Ideas.

No one is oppressing your right to argue for religion, theism, deism, or whatever else you choose to argue, but when you begin a paragraph with "everything is a religion!", no one is going to take you seriously. I mean come on, come up with a reasoned argument. I'd love to hear it, but if you think you're getting out of this unscathed after telling us how literally any argument we make is categorically, definitively absurd because it's actually religious, you've got another thing coming.

It's hardly an argument, and it's definitely not logical.