Mages are up shit’s creek I guess

[Obrae]

Zodium gif is freaking hilarious btw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Obrae]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Listen, go eat shit Skorge. You're doing this to spite Mage players while feigning some kind of "Classic-purist benevolence."

You've advocated in post after post, lobbying for every Mage NERF, whilst conveniently ignoring every
Classic change that would increase their strength.

In fact lets get you and Dolalin a corner and y'all two can just take turns defecating in each other's mouth!

To the defense of Dolalin i don't think he does in out of spite. He did took time to help us get the chain of pet corrected.

[Ligma]

You losers are still in this bitch screaming 'witch hunt!' LUL

[Valion]

Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You losers are still in this bitch screaming 'witch hunt!' LUL

All most as sad as people like you still trolling it LOL

[Jimjam]

The thing about 'selectively classic' is you document your case for what you think is classic, and if the dev's approve and can work out how to implement it then that will probably happen.

Selectively classic doesn't mean you get to whine for 44 pages in attempt to create pressure for non classic features.

If you want a say in non-classic tweaks your best bet is to volunteer as a dev instead of player / forum service user.

Otherwise find out the by level hit tables for release pets to get a sense of their dmg, find their average hits to get a sense of their attack and present it neatly in the appropriate forum.

Also stop projecting this insane 'people are trying to nerf mages to their release form to spite me'. All it does is create the impression that your thought processes revolve around boosting your favourite classes and nerfing the ones you don't like. P1999 isn't about fixing classic everquest. It is experimental archeology - practically recreating the past using limited data.

[Gorster]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The thing about 'selectively classic' is you document your case for what you think is classic, and if the dev's approve and can work out how to implement it then that will probably happen.

Selectively classic doesn't mean you get to whine for 44 pages in attempt to create pressure for non classic features.

If you want a say in non-classic tweaks your best bet is to volunteer as a dev instead of player / forum service user.

Otherwise find out the by level hit tables for release pets to get a sense of their dmg, find their average hits to get a sense of their attack and present it neatly in the appropriate forum.

Also stop projecting this insane 'people are trying to nerf mages to their release form to spite me'. All it does is create the impression that your thought processes revolve around boosting your favourite classes and nerfing the ones you don't like. P1999 isn't about fixing classic everquest. It is experimental archeology - practically recreating the past using limited data.

[TheRusty]

It's supply and demand.

You picked mage so you could rocket through the levels by pressing your "cast 01 pause 15 pet attack" macro. You do you, Rocketmage!

But being at the cutting edge of server content, one of the very few at the far end of the leveling curve means that there aren't very many people who are spawning research mats at all - much less the ones you need.

A good deal of those who are doing so, are mages themselves who need the very same mats.

And of course, Everquest being Everquest, failed combines are definitely a thing even at trivial.

But hey. You knew this going in.

[Obrae]

Originally Posted by TheRusty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's supply and demand.

You picked mage so you could rocket through the levels by pressing your "cast 01 pause 15 pet attack" macro. You do you, Rocketmage!

But being at the cutting edge of server content, one of the very few at the far end of the leveling curve means that there aren't very many people who are spawning research mats at all - much less the ones you need.

A good deal of those who are doing so, are mages themselves who need the very same mats.

And of course, Everquest being Everquest, failed combines are definitely a thing even at trivial.

But hey. You knew this going in.

Ah the jealousy, mage have never been the gods of classes and they wont be the one getting 50 the fastest nor in bigger numbers, not sure why the hate around here.

[WaffleztheAndal]

Originally Posted by TheRusty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's supply and demand.

You picked mage so you could rocket through the levels by pressing your "cast 01 pause 15 pet attack" macro. You do you, Rocketmage!

But being at the cutting edge of server content, one of the very few at the far end of the leveling curve means that there aren't very many people who are spawning research mats at all - much less the ones you need.

A good deal of those who are doing so, are mages themselves who need the very same mats.

And of course, Everquest being Everquest, failed combines are definitely a thing even at trivial.

But hey. You knew this going in.

I don't understand the mage hate either. They are far from the strongest class even in vanilla.

[Obrae]

You know people who started as gnome melee seems to be surpised that the earlier levels were full of mages, nercos and enchnaters...

It must be because all people play mages ! and necros!

Ogre warriors didn't go bitch around that everyone was a shaman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]