Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Troxx]

God bless you Vex.

I’m now 64 pages in and you are the reigning champion.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

God bless you Vex.

I’m now 64 pages in and you are the reigning champion.

Troxx continues to dodge that the howling stones video disproves his claim about solo videos not translating to group scenarios.

Trroxx continues to dodge the question about why pocket clerics are not allowed.

When Troxx cannot rebut points made, he spams the thread.

[Troxx]

I am a bit embarrassed by my posting frequency from the mid 60s to early 70s

Oh well

[Elizondo]

2 years

550 pages in

30 seconds of video dunks on all of that effort

Comedy ensues

[Troxx]

As a recap: the 80s have been dominated by DSM copy pasting the same wall of text repeatedly.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=880

Bottom of page 88….

[DeathsSilkyMist]

It looks like Troxx will continue to spam the thread, talking to himself. And he thinks this makes him look good somehow.

Meanwhile he is still dodging questions. They should be easy to answer, but this dodging shows otherwise.

We can just leave him here to talk to himself I guess. After his nonsensical and skewed recap is over, the post history will still be there, just now with more evidence of Troxx bloating the thread.

[Troxx]

I’m not going to answer you again on why pocket characters are not allowed in a thought-discussion that places very strict limitations on how many can come, what they can and can’t be, and which 4 (precisely 4) constitutes the best combination. I have already answered you.

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

pocket characters are not allowed in a thought-discussion that places very strict limitations on how many can come, what they can and can’t be, and which 4 (precisely 4) constitutes the best combination. I have already answered you.

Where did this restriction come from? You are just claiming this is the case without evidence. This is the question you keep dodging.

1. OP did not say they were prohibited.
2. Pocket clerics are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster group", and stop using mules and pocket clerics when they've already used them in the past?

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Riddle me this? If the OP had stipulated that no pockets are allowed - would that change your answer? Or would you still drop the cleric?

Simple question. Answers are binary in nature. Yes or no?

I’m still betting on you won’t answer. We all know why.

Edit: At page 112 - you spent the last 10ish pages talking about how your low level warrior without fungi is leveling faster than your enchanter with raid gear

Page 113:

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hey guys did you know warriors solo better than enchanters? I'm DSM and I definitely do not have autism

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Simple question. Answers are binary in nature. Yes or no?

I’m still betting on you won’t answer. We all know why.

Dodging by asking another question. I'll answer your question, but you need to answer mine first. You do not get to ask another question to avoid a question.

Thus far Troxx hasn't provided any evidence that supports a pocket character restriction is in place for this thread. I have evidence against his claim too.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another dodge, with Troxx continuing to talk to himself. It appears that Troxx has conceded the point. He does not have an answer for where the restriction of no pocket characters came from. He has made it up out of thin air.

Here is the evidence that supports Troxx has made the pocket character restriction up out of thin air:

1. OP did not say pocket characters were prohibited.
2. Pocket characters are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster/priest group", and stop using mules and pocket characters when they've already used them in the past?

His arguments against pocket characters are invalid until he can show where this restriction came from.