Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Toxigen]

1,766 replies

1000x just repeating the same thing over and over about pocket clerics and other irrelevant things

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

about pocket clerics and other irrelevant things

Quoted for emphasis.

Guys, unfortunately DSM has backed himself so far into a corner that he is having to create his own little “safe space” of alternate reality where he is the only arbiter of some imaginary rule set. I am concerned for his emotional and cognitive wellbeing at this point - I think we have more than a just loose screw at this point.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Quoted for emphasis.

Guys, unfortunately DSM has backed himself so far into a corner that he is having to create his own little “safe space” of alternate reality where he is the only arbiter of some imaginary rule set. I am concerned for his emotional and cognitive wellbeing at this point - I think we have more than a just loose screw at this point.

Troxx is the one backed into a corner. Instead of admitting he was wrong for once, he hides in his safe space of insults, trolling, lies, etc. It makes him feel better, even though he continues to trash his reputation.

Thank you for admitting you made up the pocket character restriction. You have no objective evidence for it. It is not in the title of the thread, or the first 100+ pages.

Here is objective evidence supporting there is no pocket character restriction:

1. OP did not say they were prohibited.
2. Pocket characters are a common practice on P99 already.
3. If you claim OP meant that you can only play four main characters and nothing else, then that would exclude mules too. OP didn't say this either.
4. Why would a normal person take a thread who's only rule is "best four person all caster group", and stop using mules and pocket characters when they've already used them in the past?

Moving forward, all arguments Troxx made claiming there is a pocket character restriction are invalid, as are any future ones.

[Duik]

We finished now?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We finished now?

Ask Troxx and Toxigen. They keep necroing the thread. They keep embarassing themselves whenever this happens too.

[Ripqozko]

I honestly feel really bad for kittens for having DSM in their guild.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I honestly feel really bad for kittens for having DSM in their guild.

Ripqozko randomly posts the same troll message over and over, which continues to be ignored.

He occassionally changes the message when he grows tired of it. I am interested to see what his next repeated troll message will be. Thus far none of them have been good sadly.

He is an admitted troll, who doesn't like be disagreed with:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=367

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I troll lot but even I tried having a normal conversation with some good info based on my experience with gear. Sta is not as easy to max on a DE. If I went int I’d be in a super hole. Even atm I need like vulak bracer to cap with 1h.

Edit: all he did was shit on it even tho I showed what I have

[Toxigen]

not even lavitzz train thread got this many replies

[Duik]

The only good thing about a massively convoluted and constantly derailed discussion like this is that nobody who values their sanity who needs actual info will be fucked reading it past page 12. (May not be exactly 12 but it will be close to being answered if not).
In closing, even if you were correct dsm, you fail to get your point across cuz you basically cannot exist with others who don't share your particular brand of douche.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The only good thing about a massively convoluted and constantly derailed discussion like this is that nobody who values their sanity who needs actual info will be fucked reading it past page 12. (May not be exactly 12 but it will be close to being answered if not).
In closing, even if you were correct dsm, you fail to get your point across cuz you basically cannot exist with others who don't share your particular brand of douche.

It is always intersting when you call me a douche. I never attack people in threads. I don't start this. I simply defend myself from attacks. If you don't like me defending myself from attacks and lies, don't attack me.

The reality is the behavior from the posters attacking and trolling is the problem. If they can fix themselves, it will be easy to have a civil discussion on these forums.

It is unfortunate that this forum has multiple posters who will bully other people when they disagree. This doesn't mean they are correct.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obvious differences of opinions but no DSM in there to make it nasty. No DSM advocating for pocket paladin for buffs and 90% rez … to rationalize bringing the SK instead.

As you can see, Troxx thinks people saying things he doesn't agree with is "nasty". He cannot have other posters posting things that don't align with his understanding of the game. If you say an SK could bring something to a theorerical group, you are "retarded". He does attack autistic people often unfortunately.