religion

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Once again you conflate two things.

Observing the available evidence and accepting the most likely conclusion via testing as "factual" is one thing (there are no facts in science, even existence itself is merely assumed but that's too advanced for you so I'll go no further.).
Preaching "Christian truth" and calling all forms of evidence fabricated (note no evidence of fabrication is provided) is another thing entirely.

It's clear nothing will change your mind. My mind on the other hand... to quote Bill Nye. SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE!

Really? There has never been any evidence of fabrication specifically to support the evolutionary theory? You actually believe that?

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You bust on my post as jumbled and full of assumptions and then try to prop up science as factual yet assumed? Nothing dogmatic and religious there!

Are you implying that the universe doesn't exist?

[Eliseus]

Oh, even more funny, you idiots say to google stuff with debunked, but when you google evolution debunked, no artciles are valid, but if I do something like God debunked, all those articles would be valid correct? You preach stuff you don't even follow yourself. You prove your ignorance because you guys only listen to your voice of reasoning, if it isn't on your side it is wrong, period. That is why I pointed out that nothing I say matters, because it will be denied anyways. I specifically already gave examples EXACTLY to the criteria your buds give, but now apparently it's not valid, because it was against what you guys were hoping for.

Basically, you guys are hypocrites, you only want taught what you want taught, or only want to hear what you want to hear. It is human nature to want the facts, but most of peoples responses against you have been that science doesn't have all the facts, that is why it is theories and not fact. Just because someone peer-reviews something you do and agrees with it doesn't necessarily make it fact. Yet you live a life full of fabrications that aren't "religious", but "religious" people aren't aloud to preach their fabrications. I know I'm just repeating myself again, and again, and you still won't get it, and you will respond with the same exact thing over and over again just as I would, and we get to have the next 47 pages of the same thing that is the first 47 pages.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Really? There has never been any evidence of fabrication specifically to support the evolutionary theory? You actually believe that?

Seeing is believing.

Have you ever gone digging for fossils? I have. It's somewhat tedious but rewarding in the end. Finding all of those fake fossils placed there by the noodly appendage to test our faith.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh, even more funny, you idiots say to google stuff with debunked, but when you google evolution debunked, no artciles are valid, but if I do something like God debunked, all those articles would be valid correct? You preach stuff you don't even follow yourself. You prove your ignorance because you guys only listen to your voice of reasoning, if it isn't on your side it is wrong, period. That is why I pointed out that nothing I say matters, because it will be denied anyways. I specifically already gave examples EXACTLY to the criteria your buds give, but now apparently it's not valid, because it was against what you guys were hoping for.

Basically, you guys are hypocrites, you only want taught what you want taught, or only want to hear what you want to hear. It is human nature to want the facts, but most of peoples responses against you have been that science doesn't have all the facts, that is why it is theories and not fact. Just because someone peer-reviews something you do and agrees with it doesn't necessarily make it fact. Yet you live a life full of fabrications that aren't "religious", but "religious" people aren't aloud to preach their fabrications. I know I'm just repeating myself again, and again, and you still won't get it, and you will respond with the same exact thing over and over again just as I would, and we get to have the next 47 pages of the same thing that is the first 47 pages.

Every debunk has a rebuttal. Each side has a unique way of addressing the counter arguments. Unfortunately for you, "well the Bible says" holds no weight and only hurts your stance.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seeing is believing.

Have you ever gone digging for fossils? I have. It's somewhat tedious but rewarding in the end. Finding all of those fake fossils placed there by the noodly appendage to test our faith.

So no one ever faked a fossil discovery? This is based on your experience as an extremely amateur paleontologist.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Seeing is believing.

Have you ever gone digging for fossils? I have. It's somewhat tedious but rewarding in the end. Finding all of those fake fossils placed there by the noodly appendage to test our faith.

Did you just say you have seen evolution?

[RobotElvis]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Like most scientists, Darwin was incorrect about the finer details of a great many things. Your entire argument hinges on the misguided belief that scientists a. believe themselves infallible and b. Revere Darwin as some sort of deital figure.

Your entire argument is flawed, both ignoring that many people are born with copious amounts of hair (see the French), and that there are hairless species of many "kinds" of animals. That's not even considering the invention of clothing and shelter could be factors.

A better question similar to yours but against your stance would be "why do Whales and Dolphins have hair follicles when they don't have any hair?

We'll that proved nothing. Darwin's beliefs do not change the amount of hair on humans or the laws of heredity.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Every debunk has a rebuttal. Each side has a unique way of addressing the counter arguments. Unfortunately for you, "well the Bible says" holds no weight and only hurts your stance.

Uhh what.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by RobotElvis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We'll that proved nothing. Darwin's beliefs do not change the amount of hair on humans or the laws of heredity.

What's your point? What about dolphins/whales?