Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Claiming I have Shaman bias is silly. I could say you have Cleric bias, and we would be at an impasse.

Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a common and strong combo. They don't have a Cleric. Why does this combo work well?

Everything is an impasse with you because you have a mental disorder and cannot admit you are ever wrong about anything

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everything is an impasse with you because you have a mental disorder and cannot admit you are ever wrong about anything

As you can.see, he knows Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a strong combo, but doesn't want to admit it. You are the one trying to avoid being wrong. We play the same game indeed.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Claiming I have Shaman bias is silly. I could say you have Cleric bias, and we would be at an impasse.

Anyone COULD say anything, hypothetically, but what actually matters in the context of this discussion is what we DO say.
What you DID say is that you could name multiple camps that need a Shaman.
What you DID say is that Shaman class can improve a group's DPS (better than a non-Epic Mage can) by root rotting multiple mobs parallel to the group.

This is not an example of an impasse, it's an example of you simply making unsubstantiated claims and providing no evidence to support them.

You're simply not going to get away with making baseless, unsubstantiated claims. It's really not a good look for you.

Also, you DO have Shaman bias, this entire thread is evidence. It's not anybody else's fault if being called out about it makes you feel "silly".

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a common and strong combo. They don't have a Cleric. Why does this combo work well?

Why wouldn't you answer the same kind of question posed to you by bcbrown regarding why you believe ENC/CLR works well together/have good synergy in a duo?

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you can.see, he knows Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a strong combo, but doesn't want to admit it. You are the one trying to avoid being wrong. We play the same game indeed.

"Best 4 person all caster/priest group"

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Best 4 person all caster/priest group"

Tell me why Enchanter/Shaman is suddenly bad without a Monk, and cannot be translated to this scenario. Clearly you agree Enchanter/Shaman/Monk is good.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tell me why Enchanter/Shaman is suddenly bad without a Monk, and cannot be translated to this scenario. Clearly you agree Enchanter/Shaman/Monk is good.

"Best 4 person all caster/priest group"

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Best 4 person all caster/priest group"

Thank you for conceding. You know Enchanter/Shaman is strong combo. It's why you are refusing to answer the question. We do play the same game, where Enchanter/Shaman is a strong combo.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

conceding...refusing to answer

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Claiming I have Shaman bias is silly. I could say you have Cleric bias, and we would be at an impasse.

Anyone COULD say anything, hypothetically, but what actually matters in the context of this discussion is what we DO say.
What you DID say is that you could name multiple camps that need a Shaman.
What you DID say is that Shaman class can improve a group's DPS (better than a non-Epic Mage can) by root rotting multiple mobs parallel to the group.

This is not an example of an impasse, it's an example of you simply making unsubstantiated claims and providing no evidence to support them.

You're simply not going to get away with making baseless, unsubstantiated claims. It's really not a good look for you.

Also, you DO have Shaman bias, this entire thread is evidence. It's not anybody else's fault if being called out about it makes you feel "silly".

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a common and strong combo. They don't have a Cleric. Why does this combo work well?

Why wouldn't you answer the same kind of question posed to you by bcbrown regarding why you believe ENC/CLR works well together/have good synergy in a duo?

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thank you for conceding. You know Enchanter/Shaman is strong combo. It's why you are refusing to answer the question. We do play the same game, where Enchanter/Shaman is a strong combo.

Conceding what?

I'm staying on topic. Maybe you should try it sometime.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Conceding what?

I'm staying on topic. Maybe you should try it sometime.

Enchanter/Shaman is off-topic?

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Best 4 person all caster/priest group"