![]() |
#41
|
|||
|
![]() Also, since I'm bored and know my Ochem mechanisms forwards and backwards... My Ochem teacher is researching Molecular Phylogenetics and wrote a computer program that accurate calculates the entropy of, and the formation of, DNA strands that make up bacteria - one step closer to explaining the how of life instead of "ermahgawd black box = evidence of God".
| ||
|
#43
|
|||
|
![]() there is still time to avoid eternal damnation
| ||
|
#44
|
|||
|
![]() even if you explained abiogenesis you dont explain genesis
| ||
|
#46
|
|||
|
![]() abiogenesis - the supposed production of living organisms from nonliving matter, as inferred from the apparent appearance of life in some infusions
genesis - the origin or mode of formation of something So you're arguing that just because we know how DNA is made it doesn't explain how the pieces of DNA are made. I'd call that a slippery slope logical fallacy in the way that you can continue that line of logic infinitely. Similar to finding a fundamental building block of the universe, if you split something in half you always end up with something smaller - or that's at least what the last 150 years of science suggest. Religion is great for helping people with problems cope with life. But that shit needs to stay out of attempting to explain the how of the universe. Simply, religion is not supported by the scientific method if applied properly. | ||
|
#47
|
|||
|
![]() your pic didn't show rellapse
| ||
|
#48
|
|||
|
![]() | ||
|
![]() |
|
|