Designated No PL Zones?

[MasterKiljaedon]

Originally Posted by Bill Tetley [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what's next? do we have to group rangers that ask for group when you're doing a duo?

Sarcasm is also deemed the lowest form of wit when your mind cannot think of something original to opine about. You just throw something obtuse into the fray and feel like you contribute to the discussion with a snarky response.

[fadetree]

Originally Posted by Bill Tetley [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what's next? do we have to group rangers that ask for group when you're doing a duo?

You're safe from me. I don't group with dickheads much.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Juevento [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I assume the same ruling applies for Chardok PLing too right?

I was curious about this after deru's original post.

If theres a pl group going on and another group shows up does the pl group have to share some of the zone?

I know this puts a huge wrench in the gears of chardok ae groups but its a load of bs to begin with...

[Daldaen]

Not all of Chardok gets pulled when AOEing.

There are several areas a group can setup (quite easily once an AOE clears the path).

So they shouldn't have to share since there are equal level areas available in the zone that aren't being touched. Just because it isn't a convenient area or the area you want doesn't mean you can take the mobs they were killing because they are able to kill so many.

[Rhambuk]

if someone wanted to rules lawyer, hypothetically here, couldn't they just sit at the fort while the pl group is at zone in since you can't claim the entire zone, and zone in isnt a camp?

its a dick move but if pl group isn't in a camp to claim any group that zones in has free reign to what camp they take regardless if its right in the middle of the pull path for aoe group. then aoe group couldn't pull mobs they had rights to, and take the risk of training/wiping the first group and get bans

[Daldaen]

You get the camp rights to whatever mobs you're keeping down right?

So if a group setup at the empty fort that and AE group had been clearing, that is already camped since they are killing it.

What you're suggesting is like going into crypt and setting up on top of empty Hierophant room. Because the group is in the main room. Major young lawyer/mega douche move to try something like that since anyone with 2 brain cells know you just don't do that.

Really though, aside from being jealous of Chardok AEers or a monk that is disgruntled that their epic might cost them 8k (AEers shouldn't be able to sell that MQ piece I agree).... Why do you want to stop them exactly? Barely anyone ever grouped there before . It would be the same now. The few groups that do start there are welcome to go further in and drop down to the slave area or do Korocust room / area near royals etc. I don't really get the drive the make AEing Chardok more tedious/against the rules. It is a pretty far out of the way zone already. An optimal one to PL in since it is so rarely trafficked and was before AEing started there.

[Rhambuk]

I'm not really against it I've just seen a few people post that they can't do the zone because its on pl lockdown 100%

I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter what mobs you keep down if youre alone in the zone you can do whatever but when another player/group zones in you have to pick what camp you want. Sitting at fort and pulling everything beyond that is really a camp its monopolizing zone content.

I'm not for or against dok pl I'm more curious as to how the situation would be handled if something like this did happen.

[Daldaen]

Pretty sure it would be handled by calling BS to your first sentence. 100% isn't locked down as stated before. There are several camps/areas that the AE groups don't pull/clear where a group can set up and kill stuff. They would say just go kill those camps if you want to group in Chardok.

[Rhambuk]

Isn't that forcing playstyle. If a group zones in and theres no one at fort because they are at zone in shouldn't they have the right to sit at fort and kill the mobs.

If this were happening in unrest and a group of level 18's wanted to main room but there was a druid pulling the entire house to zone in to pl some lvl 10 cleric and only leaving yard beetles up would it just be too bad and theyd have to settle on killing lightblue beetles because thats thats the available camp?

[Daldaen]

Difference being almost everything in Chardok is similar level range. Also unrest is far more commonly grouped by level appropriate people. And the AE groups in Chardok are getting exp whereas a PL Druid isn't.

So saying to someone to group in the slave pit or near Korocust room isn't the same no since it's all gonna be the same levelish stuff. Where you kill mobs shouldn't have any bearing on your camp so long as you keep them down on respawns.