![]() |
|
#42
|
|||
|
Seriously guys. Let's go to Luclin.
If you disagree you hate kittens | ||
|
|
|||
|
#44
|
|||
|
If we allow kittens we have to allow frogs. Forget all of that nonsense. Allow beastlords but no vah'shir, just to piss off the furbies!
Also, can I finally make an iksar rogue and maybe ranger...? I mean... Come on?! | ||
|
|
|||
|
#45
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#46
|
|||
|
erudite monks ... why not?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#47
|
|||
|
No kats, no frog people NO NO NO.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#48
|
||||
|
Quote:
Iksar Rogue makes perfect sense... ranger is so-so... problem is no druid = no rangers sadly. And iksar druid makes no sense. But it's complete B.S. because oyu don't have to have cleric to get Paladin access racially, look at halflings with cleric and warrior but no paladin, and high elves have cleric but no warrior and get paladin, and half elves have warrior but no clerics and get paladin.... makes ZERO sense to not give hybrid (rangers) to other races just because no druids... never understood it since no other hybrid followed that logic until beastlord came around, and only shaman races got them. Just one more case of the ranger getting the shaft. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#49
|
|||
|
Halfling Rangers make the most sense I guess as far as any of that goes^
Still think erudite monks would be a big hit ... or maybe barbarian for that slam. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|