Rogean: Can we get the raid discussion roster updated?

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

or how about they let another moderator have high enough access to at least change the users who can post in that sub-forum

.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Gimp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It is. It was.

Nah. Isn't a run speed spell. And yes it is legal. Grats on the revenge deletes tho.

[Gimp]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nah. Isn't a run speed spell. And yes it is legal. Grats on the revenge deletes tho.

Not gonna argue with ya, ruling was already made that disputes that anyway.

How's red treating y'all?

[Seltius]

Originally Posted by Gimp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not gonna argue with ya, ruling was already made that disputes that anyway.

Can you provide a link to that ruling please. I read through the raid rules sticky and didnt see it. I am trying to catch up on all the rules I missed over the last year or so. Seems like the new direction (Vision?) is more geared towards good Lawyerquest than actual game play.

[sambal]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nah. Isn't a run speed spell. And yes it is legal. Grats on the revenge deletes tho.

I literally have no clue what you're talking about. Can someone point to a rule? Why are you putting this in a public forum and being so cryptic?

[Cecily]

There was a player agreement between IB / TMO that only allowed SoW in VP. TMO *cough* agreed to have loot deleted for using shadow step.

I don't know how to spell this out more clearly, but from page 1:

Originally Posted by Heebo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bump. We've got someone with zero authority within our guild negotiating raid disputes. Corova is our guild leader. Please update this.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also bump.

[Culkasi]

Back on topic - moar access to raid forums plz

[sambal]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There was a player agreement between IB / TMO that only allowed SoW in VP. TMO *cough* agreed to have loot deleted for using shadow step.

I don't know how to spell this out more clearly, but from page 1:



Also bump.

Why are players writing their own rules? I don't think Seltius and I are the only ones totally out of the loop.

[Cecily]

Because we were allowed to until my guild was retroactively punished for something that there wasn't rules against. Agreement was then voided and GM rules instated. Not disputing the decision of course. I *cough* agree with it entirely.

[sambal]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because we were allowed to until my guild was retroactively punished for something that there wasn't rules against. Agreement was then voided and GM rules instated. Not disputing the decision of course. I *cough* agree with it entirely.

I just can't believe the state of the server.