![]() |
#41
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Guess who will change them for the better? THE GOV LOL | |||
Last edited by iruinedyourday; 02-21-2016 at 02:47 AM..
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
![]() Actually ill give you this one, for now. but only with an interesting argument for the libertarian.
technically we would have much faster internet in the states if it wasn't for some age old bureaucratic nonsense about building infrastructure. If a corporation supplies something for public use, a road, lights, or in this case the Internet, they have to prove that what they supply will last for a long time at least many many years. This was to ensure infrastructure projects would be built to stand the test of time and not be a cash and grab for greedy industrialists. Thats where google comes in, they are a company that like to build things that dont last and supply short term solutions. That way they can always supply the most modern technology. This ideal contradicts ideals of yore and in the case of providing highspeed wi-fi to everyone at free to low cost clashed. Google would be forced to build infrastructure that would last many years when what it would rather do is fly a bunch of weather balloons in the air to provide internet, or any other short term solution. So thats part of the many reasons we dont have the best internet speeds in the US. Theres many more but thats just a case where the argument for less governmental control could be made. I prefer an argument that the governmental control that once worked very well, and resulted in the best infrastructure in the entire world, could once again do that if updated to be more in line with progressive standards. tl;dr sometimes good government policies age poorly, the case for the argument is we can be involved in that if we want to be but with a corporation remember, whatever they want to do, you do. | ||
Last edited by iruinedyourday; 02-21-2016 at 04:26 AM..
|
|
#44
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
The solution for your envy is to move to Deutschland and gain citizenship. Do the rest of us a favor and stop trying to make the USA your idealistic, European, world. Have a nice day.
__________________
| |||
|
#45
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#46
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
Last edited by Raev; 02-21-2016 at 01:45 PM..
|
|
#47
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
With regard to differences between the political systems of USA and Germany... it's complicated. Our problems date back to the 1700's and profound cultural and ideological differences between segments of our population, and it's an oversimplification of me to say "If we want to improve our political process, we should just copy Germany!". It's apples and oranges. But I do believe we have good options on the table, stuff like WolfPAC and real campaign finance / gerrymandering reform, and when I say we should be more like Germany, I mean we should fix our system so it works as well as theirs, not emulate their political process. I'm not convinced representative democracy can't work with 300 million people but can with 80 or 127 million. Heterogeneity is a real problem though. That said, Germany is by no means perfect, and I think I use European systems too much as a way to demonstrate more leftist policies producing better outcomes. It's obviously a flawed and tired approach and there are dozens of things you can justifiably nitpick about it. It's just lazy. | |||
|
#48
|
|||
|
![]() I've got family in Bavaria. There are a lot of small towns in Germany still and when you drop 7k Syrians in a town that formerly had 1,500 living in it.. well it's going to obliterate the native culture. 7k Syrians in Berlin would be a drop in the bucket with minimal alteration to the parent culture.
| ||
|
#49
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#50
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
![]() |
|
|