Comparing Fox, MSNBC, CNN Home Pages

[robayon]

YOU CAN'T CUT BACK ON FUNDING! YOU WILL REGRET THIS!

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why do they hide the race of the people they pull over many times? Almost like, if they recorded it, it would show bias.

To my knowledge they only do this in liberal cities such as San Fran whose police are most likely also liberal

https://apnews.com/article/us-news-a...d502c2c621a62f

And the reason they do it is because they don’t want to show how most crimes there are committed by black people

They even mention the reason right in the article: “to stop perpetuating racial stereotypes”

But it’s weird, I watched the videos of the mass looting in high end clothing stores there and it was mostly black people. Is San Fran mostly black?

[Jibartik]

if I was dictator I would change the freedom of the press to be something like, the rights of the people to have the freedom of information or something, so we and the press wouldn't consider themselves to be so friggen precious. But the press or anyone would still be able to have access to the shit the press is supposed to be informing us about.

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the road maintenance funding comes from taxes drawn from the wages of the workers the factory employs.

plus it makes stuff, which is nice.

It doesnt make anything. Its just a place boxes a taken off one truck, like 70 washers, then distributed by truck to other 7 stores in the area. They dont make anything at all besides waste and pollution.

Walmart should pay for the roads they use more than everyone else. Employee uses the road twice a day. The company uses the road 24/7, trucks backed up at the docks and shit. They could have simply said "no" and taxed them like they do every other business in the area. They said "yes" and got some bribes i mean campaign contributions, probably some gift cards and shit, and a plaque on the building. The concrete company up the street didnt get a deal like that.. The funny thing is, there is a paving company on the same street. Their parking lot is immaculate, not a hole anywhere, cause they can be sued for that. They called a paving company from out of town to do that, too.

Same thing with a tractor the county had to buy. They could have gotten it from the local john deere. They went out of town, got some kubota or some shit. Now when it breaks down, it costs more money to ship it out of the county to the dealership to get it fixed. Gee, I wonder why they did that... Tired of that shit. Theres one tractor dealer, buy it from them. Its not like they were picking favorites. It starts at your local BOCC.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To my knowledge they only do this in liberal cities such as San Fran whose police are most likely also liberal

https://apnews.com/article/us-news-a...d502c2c621a62f

And the reason they do it is because they don’t want to show how most crimes there are committed by black people

They even mention the reason right in the article: “to stop perpetuating racial stereotypes”

But it’s weird, I watched the videos of the mass looting in high end clothing stores there and it was mostly black people. Is San Fran mostly black?

the racial angle isn't a winner for you.

[unsunghero]

But yes two things can be true at once:

Black people commit more crime per capita of population than white people

And also, black people are over-policed

Both are true at the same time


Edit: the thing that Democrats and Republicans disagree on is that Democrats claim the reason that there are more black crimes per capita of population is DUE to over-policing. And Republicans claim that over-policing is DUE to a population that commits more crimes per capita. So it’s the eternal chicken or the egg argument

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So black people are not prosecuted more harshly, more often, than white people?? Weird.. Cause the numbers dont show that.

Police patrol white neighborhoods like they do black ones? They pull over white people like minorities? Its really weird how the numbers always shake out differently..

Why do they hide the race of the people they pull over many times? Almost like, if they recorded it, it would show bias.. Whats really weird is the places that do record it, ohhh... its not good. https://sc.edu/uofsc/posts/2020/06/r...ffic_stops.php

Dohhh.... I mean, how does someone explain that? So like anything, we can assume if its happening here, its happening everywhere? I would.. seeing as how it is.

The numbers also show that the criminal justice system is highly sexist, considering that about 93% of all inmates are males? Do you agree with that simple analysis?

Young black males commit far more crime than any other demographic in the united states. This is simply a fact, and explains these disparities far easier than any convoluted conspiratorial notion about how the cops are all super secret racists.

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To my knowledge they only do this in liberal cities such as San Fran whose police are most likely also liberal

https://apnews.com/article/us-news-a...d502c2c621a62f

And the reason they do it is because they don’t want to show how most crimes there are committed by black people

They even mention the reason right in the article: “to stop perpetuating racial stereotypes”

WOW. Thats the most racist thing you've ever said. You think enforcement is the same thing as crime rate...?

You just said it. "most crimes" are not committed by 14% of the population of the USA. You're saying that 14% of the population is responsible for over 50% of the crime in the USA. I see a shadow on you. Its in the shape of a hammer.

Those beliefs you have are the definition of racism. You're wrong, for one. Look how STUPID that is when you math it out. 14% does over 50%.. you said "most crimes" so you mean more than 50%, too. Like 80%, in your mind.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

WOW. Thats the most racist thing you've ever said. You think enforcement is the same thing as crime rate...?

You just said it. "most crimes" are not committed by 14% of the population of the USA. You're saying that 14% of the population is responsible for over 50% of the crime in the USA. I see a shadow on you. Its in the shape of a hammer.

Those beliefs you have are the definition of racism. You're wrong, for one. Look how STUPID that is when you math it out. 14% does over 50%.. you said "most crimes" so you mean more than 50%, too. Like 80%, in your mind.

Black people have a higher representation than white people when normalized for population size yes, that’s just a fact, if you want to call it racist be my guest

But it’s true regardless. White people commit more crimes overall, but there are many times more white people in the USA. When normalized for population size, they are under-represented while black people are over-represented

[Gravydoo II]

Is anyone else grinning at how easily they removed their hoods?