Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 07-14-2024, 09:55 PM
Troxx Troxx is offline
Planar Protector

Troxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: The sands of DSM’s vagina
Posts: 4,285
Default

Honestly if it’s a choice between Ranger and rog; I’d lean into the Ranger. Less DPS for sure but I will admit that all the “other” they bring to the table likely will have a much bigger impact than the difference between the rog and Ranger dps. Sow, attack buffs, regen, dmg shield, CoE, harmony, long duration snare, ability to help cc in a pinch and (yes I know I poo poo’d it earlier) a 50% slow.

Exception of course being whether or not there are locked doors you want to hunt behind.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist View Post
There is no fail message for FD.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...43&postcount=2



.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-15-2024, 09:07 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,776
Default

i guess it depends on the hypotheticals...but i don't think rogue is the questionable 4th

its between monk and ranger...and it depends

full twink group with all epics rdy to go at 46? - ok maybe ranger then

self-found / funded / fresh start with no existing plat? - definitely monk

but its bard / paladin / rogue for the core 3
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-15-2024, 02:51 PM
Vivitron Vivitron is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 454
Default

It's at least a little tempting to say 4 monks, especially if they already have a lot of resources on the server. Get that full group flop.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-16-2024, 10:16 AM
cd288 cd288 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,356
Default

Agree Rogue absolutely needed. Bard can pull if you want to swap out the Monk and have the Ranger throw regen and low level Druid buffs on the Pally.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-17-2024, 11:51 AM
Keebz Keebz is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 939
Default

If not twinked, I actually think rogue is pretty trash, at least until they find a good MH piercer. What's the best piercer they can reasonably attain? Frozen Shard in the 50's? Similar for Monk, but I guess you just spend a lot of time in KC and hope for the best?

I'm slightly different in that my core 3 I like are BRD/PAL/RNG/X with either MNK or ROG as the 4th.

The RNG is there mainly just to swarmcaller things, but the added utility would be pretty sweet (tracking for self found is real good). To this end, I could see swapping in WAR for RNG, since they can truncheon (a much harder drop to come by though) and maybe their overall tankiness (esp w/ disc) unlocks something. But the overall logic is the slow is both better (50%) and also frees the bard up to provide more value, so it double dips in a sense.

EDIT: I should stipulate I'm going off the premise of self found.
Last edited by Keebz; 07-17-2024 at 11:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-17-2024, 02:05 PM
Zuranthium Zuranthium is offline
Planar Protector

Zuranthium's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Location: Plane of Mischief
Posts: 1,801
Default

Bard still has to use slow until a Proc weapon triggers, I don't find much extra value there. Would rather have a Rogue and kill everything faster. I'm not getting the concern about available weapons, Swarmcaller is only 46+ to begin with. You could go join a Plane of Fear raid at 46 as a Rogue and get a good piercer, there are multiple that drop and normally are just thrown away.
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.