Did he really..... - Page 5

Macken · #1 10-21-2011, 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Softcore PK [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never once experienced anything like that manastone KS, in all my years of playing on VZ. These hypothetical situations of yours are exactly that: hypothetical.

Happened to me and others on VZTZ. Just because you seem to lack imagination does not mean the rest of the community will.

In Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Bahrain, Egypt, Somalia or Yemen they do not give you a pass because you are too low level. The medics get attacked before they heal, not just after.

Before AND after. All levels. Circular. All things good.

Softcore PK · #2 10-21-2011, 01:47 AM

Hm, yes I could see that happening with the VZTZ crowd. And since so many of you are coming to Red99, this may actually be a problem that needs addressing.

I'd be all for making it against the rules to KS.

Macken · #3 10-21-2011, 01:50 AM

You trollin?

Softcore PK · #4 10-21-2011, 02:02 AM

No, I'm not trolling. Why do we have to allow KSing on a red server? If the issue cannot be solved with pvp, then I see nothing wrong with a first to engage/camp policy. Again, I doubt these sorts of things will happen very frequently, with the 8 range and dynamic possibly making it bigger. The handful of times GMs have to deal with KS petitions would be worth not changing the server in such big ways.

And of course KSing would still be legal if the opposing groups are in range and able to pvp :/

Macken · #5 10-21-2011, 02:10 AM

Stop trollin or become a gm until you learn your lesson.

Diggles · #6 10-21-2011, 03:24 AM

macken just compared EQ PvP to live fire combat in fucking real life.

Samoht · #7 10-21-2011, 09:09 AM

Griefing is going to happen one way or the other. The difference is, which is harder to do? Is it harder for a lowbie to KS someone 8 levels higher than them or is it harder for a level 50 to sit outside capital cities and gank people the second they ding the level that enables PVP?

Sounds like the dynamic range ensures less griefing to me.

Oh, and Macken, the likelihood of you losing 2v1 is always greater, whether or not you complain that they're outside of your +8/-8. You're just a whiner.

Macken · #8 10-21-2011, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

is it harder for a level 50 to sit outside capital cities and gank people the second they ding the level that enables PVP?
.

Because it's so fun to kill to level 6's when you are 50. It will be a MAJOR problem.

Quick! Make up some rules to change this! Delay the project if need be. We must stop this behaviour since it happens all day everyday.

And besides, greenie has no recourse, it's not like he can run or log off or anything like that. We must sacrifice the integrity of the server to protect the weaker players, especially since they won't play long either way.

Yes.

Samoht · #9 10-21-2011, 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

it's not like he can run or log off or anything like that.

Ever tried to run from a level 24 druid camping your level 7 dwarf rogue INSIDE kaladim? Where do you run?

You just want to force people who can't defend themselves off the server.

Macken · #10 10-21-2011, 10:33 AM

No.

Because im a pvper.

I just want a server where there is an expected level of competance.

I don't go play in the sandbox with my son's class.

He doesn't play texas hold'em with me and my bros.

Boundries bro.

Boundries.