Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit?
yes 327 68.99%
no 147 31.01%
Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #491  
Old 08-06-2013, 08:45 AM
Vandy Vandy is offline
Sarnak

Vandy's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xmonkx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Prove it?

And you looked through Afterlife's archives please show me this too because I raided with Afterlife. Again prove it. Your word is shit here Tassle. As I said, this is your thread, you have the burden of proof.

Mith Marr was a cutthroat server. Anyone from Mith Marr that plays on P99 can attest to that. Why do you think Cats and Hats left the server? Now dont get me wrong. Afterlife did some stuff to make the community happy. Open Hate/Fear raids for free loots. But when it came to contested mobs it was get the hell out the way or get ran over. Aka VP training.
I know one of the original co-leaders of CiH and I also played on Mith Marr at the time. He told me that they butted heads with AL consistently on VS and Trak but transferred off the server before anyone even went into VP and there was no such training.
  #492  
Old 08-06-2013, 10:54 AM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Rename rants and flames to:

Rants, Flames and 20+ page whines
  #493  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:00 PM
Wrei Wrei is offline
Sarnak

Wrei's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xmonkx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You must have missed the FE boat when they went into VP, guess you didn't hear. They killed Druushk with the same rules implemented now. As far as dedication and motivation to stick it out and keep getting kills is another story. And the whole "they have more trainers then us" is complete bullshit. FE in there prime had a shit ton of them. Proof is in the pudding - skill over numbers.
Come on that IS funny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So in short, Rogean seems to say it isn't like live and we implemented training cause I don't have to explain myself to you guys (or have my judgement questioned) but open to changes if warranted. Sirken seems to favour Darwinism to take place, fight fire with fire and earn respect by being bigger douches than TMO.

Instead of logically trying to explain how it's better one way or another, it would be nice to have a server poll started by the server staff (to prevent trolling) that asks everyone if they are happy with the current raiding rules/policies. If the server sits at 50/50 then status quo should be preserved. If there is however an overwhelming side towards changes another poll should then be started regarding "viable" alternative rules.

I say viable, because it's clear this is still a privately run emu and not all options would be realistically available (especially those that require increased moderation or coding modifications). If the server staff isn't even willing to do that then one of the players should start the thread here. Those who are passionate about changes should then spread the word through word of mouth on the server and keep the poll running for about a week. Anything over 500+ responses should be pretty legitimate. If that doesn't prompt changes from the staff then I doubt very little would change the policy. At that point you just need to get with the program or GTFO.

Each side has their own arguments with its own flaws and merits. This shouldn't be arguing pointlessly about who is right but more about if people are happy playing under current conditions.
  #494  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:11 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by p-niner [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tassellhoff sounds like a REAL SWELL CRYBABY
P99 is more like
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #495  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:13 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Just as long as sleeper's isn't like this we can just forget the zone in say...6 months? :3
  #496  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:13 PM
Elizabetha Elizabetha is offline
Orc


Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: East Commonlands
Posts: 34
Default

It's just a shame that training is employed. I understand the circumstances that make folks treat each other like dirt over nothing. It's a shame.
  #497  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:19 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrei [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Come on that IS funny [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So in short, Rogean seems to say it isn't like live and we implemented training cause I don't have to explain myself to you guys (or have my judgement questioned) but open to changes if warranted. Sirken seems to favour Darwinism to take place, fight fire with fire and earn respect by being bigger douches than TMO.

Instead of logically trying to explain how it's better one way or another, it would be nice to have a server poll started by the server staff (to prevent trolling) that asks everyone if they are happy with the current raiding rules/policies. If the server sits at 50/50 then status quo should be preserved. If there is however an overwhelming side towards changes another poll should then be started regarding "viable" alternative rules.

I say viable, because it's clear this is still a privately run emu and not all options would be realistically available (especially those that require increased moderation or coding modifications). If the server staff isn't even willing to do that then one of the players should start the thread here. Those who are passionate about changes should then spread the word through word of mouth on the server and keep the poll running for about a week. Anything over 500+ responses should be pretty legitimate. If that doesn't prompt changes from the staff then I doubt very little would change the policy. At that point you just need to get with the program or GTFO.

Each side has their own arguments with its own flaws and merits. This shouldn't be arguing pointlessly about who is right but more about if people are happy playing under current conditions.
The best human entertainment comes from conquering something you perceive to be greater than yourself or by strife. If there wasn't competition for mates/resources/whatever humanity would die of boredom. Due to scarcity some percentage of humanity will always be unhappy(provided scarcity exists forever). So doing a poll on whether or not people are happy is really a moot point. This is a raid scarcity server... people will be unhappy if what they want is raids. Just like people were un-happy in leveling zones the past week when so many more people were exping.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #498  
Old 08-06-2013, 12:39 PM
Nietche Nietche is offline
Kobold

Nietche's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 171
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If there wasn't competition for mates/resources/whatever humanity would die of boredom.
Which is what would happen if the GM's gave in to a re-distribution of wealth motive for "leveling the playing field" by making the acquisition of hand-outs easier.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Systolic View Post
Is this a joke? This is crazier than anything I have purported, and I have had evidence for everything I have said as well.
  #499  
Old 08-06-2013, 04:30 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nietche [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Which is what would happen if the GM's gave in to a re-distribution of wealth motive for "leveling the playing field" by making the acquisition of hand-outs easier.
It's not a hand out

It's about not being a dick.

There is a difference.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #500  
Old 08-06-2013, 06:06 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's not a hand out

It's about not being a dick.

There is a difference.
This.


I don't get why people think sanctioned training in VP creates some kind of mega-competitive atmosphere. Most of the VP keyed players don't even want to waste their time zoning into VP just to get trained by a bunch of griefers. It simply isn't worth their time and being able to train/countertrain is not difficult. In fact its nothing more than typing /target assholetrainingmonkornecro and /spam bladestopper. WOW, THAT IS SO HARD TO DO GUYS. Why should we have to derail trains to have a shot at legitimately killing a dragon? How does this make sense? How is this classic? What is the logic behind it?

The point is training shouldn't be allowed, it wasn't on live. It ruins more people's fun than it provides for the select few who are able to train. Look at the poll numbers, they likely speak volumes about how the raiders on this server feel about this situation.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.