religion

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I explained what I wanted from you a few times now. If you cant read a simple paragraph and digest it...no skin off my back but you come off looking like a complete moron.

I google debunked several times for evolution and even gave you a google link on how to do it? Do I need to bold your quote again of your exact words?

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I google debunked several times for evolution and even gave you a google link on how to do it? Do I need to bold your quote again of your exact words?

Yes, please go ahead and quote my exact phrase again. I want you to take time and digest what I was saying and the whole point of the exercise. I have repeated it a few times now and even gave examples but it still seems to be going over your head. Maybe you should write it out on the chalkboard a few hundred times to let it sink in.

[Eliseus]

Just for sake of clarity.

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Simply type the word "debunked" after the crazy shit you are about to post.

I also found it interesting among your posts the countless times you have resulted in degrading peoples credibility through name calling, or stuff like calling them children, and that you are on your way home, and goodbye or something. I'm not doubting some of the "credible" sources you would call them, but I'm definitely doubting your lack of knowledge at all. Maybe you should let the big boys handle it and keep with your "religious" following towards their discoveries than argue on their behalf.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just for sake of clarity.



I also found it interesting among your posts the countless times you have resulted in degrading peoples credibility through name calling, or stuff like calling them children, and that you are on your way home, and goodbye or something. I'm not doubting some of the "credible" sources you would call them, but I'm definitely doubting your lack of knowledge at all. Maybe you should let the big boys handle it and keep with your "religious" following towards their discoveries than argue on their behalf.

Lol, the fact you think you are even remotely intelligent is the funniest part. You cant even read a full paragraph without getting lost and taking things out of context. Keep trying though. One day you may actually come up with an argument that debunks 170+ years of evolutionary studies and thousands of scientists with PHDs.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol, the fact you think you are even remotely intelligent is the funniest part. You cant even read a full paragraph without getting lost and taking things out of context. Keep trying though. One day you may actually come up with an argument that debunks 170+ years of evolutionary studies and thousands of scientists with PHDs.

Ok pumpkin.

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok pumpkin.

Nice rebuttal...you sack of shit.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nice rebuttal...you sack of shit.

This right here supports exactly what I was saying earlier how leewrong is not only hypocritical, but he resorts to this right here. On another note, you didn't give me your opinion on

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For someone so obsessed with Charles Darwin, I'm surprised you haven't read some of the quotes.

"In the long history of humankind (and animal kind, too) those who learned to collaborate and improvise most effectively have prevailed."

Which you are far from.

"A moral being is one who is capable of reflecting on his past actions and their motives - of approving of some and disapproving of others."

Which completely negates the earlier convo that there is no 1 country like another if you base morals off that.

"The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic."

Basically, you argue that a guy who knows it all, admits he doesn't have a clue.

"My mind seems to have become a kind of machine for grinding general laws out of large collections of facts."

Almost contradicts his last statement which in turn destroys some of his credibility.

"On the ordinary view of each species having been independently created, we gain no scientific explanation."

Oh I see, so this in line with one of the earlier quotes = evolution? We don't need facts, we can just make claims.

How about

"I am quite conscious that my speculations run quite beyond the bounds of true science."

You get the point I'm getting at. Actually, you probable don't, I don't know why I even posted these quotes.

In the end of this post I leave you with this.

"...I feel most deeply that the whole subject is too profound for the human intellect. A dog might as well speculate on the mind of Newton.— Let each man hope & believe what he can.—"

so quoting it for you. I want to know what derogatory term I will be called for this one. I'm writing a book on it, so please don't hold back.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol, the fact you think you are even remotely intelligent is the funniest part. You cant even read a full paragraph without getting lost and taking things out of context. Keep trying though. One day you may actually come up with an argument that debunks 170+ years of evolutionary studies and thousands of scientists with PHDs.

I believe this particular logical fallacy is called "the appeal to authority".

By the way, theologians have PHD's also. Does that qualify them to decide for everyone what is correct or incorrect?

[leewong]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I believe this particular logical fallacy is called "the appeal to authority".

By the way, theologians have PHD's also. Does that qualify them to decide for everyone what is correct or incorrect?

Dont be dense. I was pointing out that nearly two hundred years and thousands of scientific papers, experiments, etc back up what this p99 genius is trying to overturn. Creationism doesnt hold water in the scientific community because it isnt even science. It is dullards misunderstanding and mischaracterizing of the work people have put into these subjects and have been studying in far greater detail and who have vastly more knowledge than some asshats that just happen to browse answersingenesis one day.

If I need surgery I go to a surgeon. I dont ask joe-bob down the street what he thinks are the risks of a appendectomy because he hasnt studied for a large part of his life trying to acquire knowledge in that field. Joe-bob has never operated on someone just as I doubt a single person arguing against evolution has above a high school eduction on biology if even that. They lack knowledge and you need knowledge to have a intelligent answer.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by leewong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dont be dense. I was pointing out that nearly two hundred years and thousands of scientific papers, experiments, etc back up what this p99 genius is trying to overturn. Creationism doesnt hold water in the scientific community because it isnt even science. It is dullards misunderstanding and mischaracterizing of the work people have put into these subjects and have been studying in far greater detail and who have vastly more knowledge than some asshats that just happen to browse answersingenesis one day.

If I need surgery I go to a surgeon. I dont ask joe-bob down the street what he thinks are the risks of a appendectomy because he hasnt studied for a large part of his life trying to acquire knowledge in that field. Joe-bob has never operated on someone just as I doubt a single person arguing against evolution has above a high school eduction on biology if even that. They lack knowledge and you need knowledge to have a intelligent answer.

If we are to use a time-frame like you do, the belief in God extends all the way back to known discovery of human cultures.