Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-02-2015, 06:31 AM
towbes towbes is offline
Aviak

towbes's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 96
Default

I finally made it to the end of this thread and I still am not sure what I believe. But thanks for helping me waste an hour of work time!

+1
  #2  
Old 02-02-2015, 07:58 AM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

How can 3/10 guilds disband the rotation? Why don't the other 7 of you just say we have a majority vote that says the rotation is still intact. Failing to continue to abide by previously agreed upon rotation is a violation of the rotation agreement you entered into and as such is grounds for raid suspension per GM reinforced Class R Raid policies.

You're in class R, you chose to be in Class R, there's no other choice but to move up to class C or fade into obscurity. How does 3/10 guild decision to opt-out of the agreed upon raid nuances constitute a ruling vote for the dissolution of the Class R raid rotation entirely, and if the CLass R raid rotation was made to ensure an equitable distribution than how does it justify its continued existence while violating the premise upon which it was created?

If you dissolve the rotation, you dissolve the tier entirely and the server is 100% class C. Otherwise ur just saying you deserve to quarantine 33% of the raid content from TMO and IB to split amongst the three of you, and to hell with the other 7 guilds upon which the rotation was founded to support.
  #3  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:06 AM
Fianna Fianna is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 148
Default

Throndor, while the class system (C,R,FFA) is GM enforced, the rotation in R is not. Basically BDA, Taken and Divinity are saying if the other guilds do not agree, they will just kill everything in R themselves.
  #4  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:13 AM
Culkasi Culkasi is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Europa
Posts: 370
Default

I guess the question is how long TMO/IB would be okay with BDA/Taken potentially taking up 1/9th of all loot "uncontested" versus the 1/6 TMO/IB get - the gap between R and C suddenly became significantly shorter, without making R nearly as cutthroat as C is.

Anyway, its been a very sad week, and I appreciate that to many people on the server its a good laugh - but we have collectively worked very hard for this in the past year, and like anything good, its sad to see it dissolve, for whatever reason, and see much of the hard work put into building relationships and making it work be tossed aside because we can't find a common ground.
__________________
Culkasi Lonelywolf
Officer in Europa
https://www.europaguild.eu/forum/
  #5  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:17 AM
Fanguru Fanguru is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 199
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Culkasi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I guess the question is how long TMO/IB would be okay with BDA/Taken potentially taking up 1/9th of all loot "uncontested" versus the 1/6 TMO/IB get - the gap between R and C suddenly became significantly shorter, without making R nearly as cutthroat as C is.
TMO and IB have no say in the matter.
Also there are still lockouts in class-R, so BDA and Taken would not get all the mobs.
  #6  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:38 AM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Culkasi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I guess the question is how long TMO/IB would be okay with BDA/Taken potentially taking up 1/9th of all loot "uncontested" versus the 1/6 TMO/IB get
I think that's a good point. If R fully collapsed I think the C guilds will be coming for dem pixels and we'd be back to the 'wild west'. How would they expect the GMs to enforce a class that doesn't exist anymore, I wonder?

"guys wait, it's still a rotation... but its FFA" - makes no sense whatsoever [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The question is perhaps whether BDA/Taken/Divinity will risk going down that road. Most likely all 10 guilds lose because pals who used to run the show want pixels for their alts.

Interested to see where this goes, I don't think they've thought it through.
__________________
  #7  
Old 02-02-2015, 08:14 AM
Fanguru Fanguru is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 199
Default

You do not understand the situation, Throndor.

The rotation is a player-made agreement, it is not GM-enforced and GMs have said numerous times they do not like the rotation and feel class R guilds should compete among themselves.

The current system does not "ensure an equitable distribution" since small guilds can currently ally themselves, making one kill force with 2 or 3 guilds, yet keeping 2 or 3 turns in the rotation.

BDA, Taken and Divinity don't want to prevent smaller guilds from killing mobs, they want to encourage alliances and mergers within smaller guilds.
  #8  
Old 02-02-2015, 09:07 AM
thieros thieros is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 565
Default

class R cant kill vp mobs. so nahhhh
  #9  
Old 02-02-2015, 09:16 AM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 19,999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fanguru [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also there are still lockouts in class-R, so BDA and Taken would not get all the mobs.
Assuming the rotation still exists of course. If it collapses, what then? Everything would (should) be FFA, and we'll all see less.

There seems to be a lot of banking on the fact that we'd still have a 2 tier system if there isn't an agreement on this proposal. Would BDA/Taken/Divinity be asking for protection from TMO/IB when they get on their horses to go raiding?

Interesting times...
__________________
  #10  
Old 02-02-2015, 09:39 AM
Fanguru Fanguru is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 199
Default

Your inability to understand the situation is baffling.

GMs enforce C/R/FFA.
As far as GMs are concerned, R is basically FFA without TMO/IB and with lockouts.

The rotation in R is a player agreement.
GMs said numerous times they do not like the rotation and prefer competition.
The C/R/FFA system does not rely on the current R rotation.

If the rotation falls, the C/R/FFA system continues.
Anyone in R can take down a R target provided they do not have a lockout on this target.

The only way things completely change is if GMs make a 180° and go back on their positions.
Velious release could also change things with Kunark targets.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.