Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #501  
Old 01-02-2012, 09:56 AM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

You know, I don't like exp being tampered with, because i love the classic feel... but, the first few levels could be sped up without ruining the experience. I remember thinking when i was level 3, oh fuk this is going to be hard.

Anyone whos trying to get into the game may be slightly encouraged if you reach that first spell and new skills level a bit faster to where you character comes into his own.

Drawback is, if you mess with exp, where do you draw the line. Once you change anything, then its not "classic". In the end I just say leave it. People will play or they wont, server will die or it wont, but it wont come from the exp rate. If anything the classic feel will generate more people than otherwise...
  #502  
Old 01-02-2012, 07:04 PM
Butthead Butthead is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 224
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dullah [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You know, I don't like exp being tampered with, because i love the classic feel... but, the first few levels could be sped up without ruining the experience. I remember thinking when i was level 3, oh fuk this is going to be hard.

Anyone whos trying to get into the game may be slightly encouraged if you reach that first spell and new skills level a bit faster to where you character comes into his own.

Drawback is, if you mess with exp, where do you draw the line. Once you change anything, then its not "classic". In the end I just say leave it. People will play or they wont, server will die or it wont, but it wont come from the exp rate. If anything the classic feel will generate more people than otherwise...


maybe consider adding (parts?) of luclin? i know its risky business but maybe a FEW aa's would help? maybe make aa exp harder to get? idk.
Classic eq is bomb but not every1 will fully agree on that. we shud look into adding more content maybe to lure in more players?

if every1 recruited 1 person it could makea huugh difference...


we need to get onto eq1 / 2 and promote the server!
really any game that might have eq players needs to hear about this server.

how could we deww it?

il b uber disapointed ifi finally get 50 and jus quit cause theres no reason to play
  #503  
Old 01-02-2012, 07:47 PM
Steaks Steaks is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 425
Default

will take care of itself with increased xp , its the investment , people arent going to do it this day in age

its just the way it is

if it isnt increased things will work themselves out

if it is , things will also work themselves out , who knows how?

i sure do
  #504  
Old 01-03-2012, 12:54 AM
Dullah Dullah is offline
Planar Protector

Dullah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,241
Default

Obviously some will, and those who won't are most likely too flaky to hang around long anyway.

The main appeal of EQ is not the pvp, though its fun. Its the sum of its parts, a large one being that sense of accomplishment derived from leveling up. Then, acquiring rare items, and making friends and allies required to progress in both the pvp and pve facets of the game. All the parts making it the greatest MMO ever, are undermined by trivializing experience.

There may be those who feel that getting easy levels and, therefore, gear is enjoyable, but the player who is thus minded will be more likely playing a shiny new game thats built from the ground up on this principle.
  #505  
Old 01-03-2012, 01:38 AM
Shrubwise Shrubwise is offline
Planar Protector

Shrubwise's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steaks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
if it is , things will also work themselves out , who knows how?

i sure do
banned
  #506  
Old 01-03-2012, 03:51 AM
Hairybuttwhole Hairybuttwhole is offline
Kobold

Hairybuttwhole's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vile [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Also.. I've contemplated buying Skyrim because of my unwillingness to LFG for an hour or so with no luck and soloing .003% a blue every 15 min and then rage logging because I wasted the minimal play time I had..

Is Skyrim worth it?
diablo III
  #507  
Old 01-03-2012, 10:06 AM
Vile Vile is offline
Planar Protector

Vile's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,304
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairybuttwhole [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
diablo III
eta?
  #508  
Old 01-03-2012, 12:03 PM
Flipmode Flipmode is offline
Sarnak

Flipmode's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vile [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
eta?
let me know
__________________
<Euro Idiots>
  #509  
Old 01-03-2012, 01:02 PM
stormlord stormlord is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,165
Default

Why does no one mention how disabling sof/uf client support might have hurt population too?

As a recap, here're some things I'd do to "stimulate" this server:
1) Remove both exp loss on pvp death and pvp item loot and instead add a pvp-points system that you can view on a website just like they did on live - can view pvp kills/death/points for players/guilds/etc
2) Add global chat (blue had it until population was about 600 or more)
3) Advertise in MMORPG forums (legally, you have to buy titanium, so advertising on free MMORPG forums is not what should be done in this case)
4) Move default bind points to guards so people cannot be bind camped by default
5) Remind people that classic EQ isn't about being level 50+; it's about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, .. 50! You can pvp at any point in your level progression. Don't worry about 50. 50 is 1/50th of the fun.

A point I want to make about the nature of EQ...

The major problem is that EQ is a group-based game and it statically associates itself with population. This means that, given a low population, players will find it very difficult to get good experience rates and smooth progression. This, of course, leads to frustration and high attrition.

The fact that this is a pvp server makes it all worse.

You can increase the experience rate, but, if everytying else is equal, this will not solve the problem of players not being able to form groups (let alone balanced groups). Nor will it reduce corpse runs. Nor will it make the game feel more populated. Nor will it help you to get a bind or find someone to sow you or find someone to help you get your corpse. Nor will it stop you from being pvp'd. Nor will it help you to find a tracker or a porter.

Essentially, increasing experience rates is not the universal answer. Take someone doing a quest on a low population server, for example. You might increase the experience rates, but since EQ is still group-based then the player still must out-level the quest in order to do it. They do this because there're not enough people to group with. This changes how the quest will feel when you do it. Instead of hiding/sneaking/invising/mezzing/tracking/etc and working with others to attain the goal, you just slaughter most everything to get your prize. That's what happens when a group-based game is reduced to a solo-based game. It's very difficult to change hte nature of a game without starting fresh with a new slate. It's like trying to make an 80 year old 20 again. It's futile. It ends up being something that's not like a group-based adventure. Bottom line, increasing experience rates as the be-all/end-all answer is like hooking up a bad heart to a machine. While it works when the heart is bad, it might actually get in the way when the heart is good. (In a lot of ways, this reminds me of the warrior class. No matter how much you increase experience rates on emulated solo-based servers, if you don't fundamentally change warriors then a warrior is still a warrior. They can't hide/sneak. They can't invis. They can't backstab. No mezzing. They can't teleport. They can't gate. They can't root or snare. They can't sow. They can't heal. They can't track. The warrior has got to be the most boring class ever created. To fix a warrior, you got to do a hell of a lot more than increase the experience rate.)

Now, it's possible that players might stick around if they see their experience meter go up. If this is the case and the game actually gains population then my argument is that as the population goes up the experience rate should be lowered. In fact, a script or piece of code should be written to automatically increase or decrease experience rate dependent on the overall population. The reason it's important to do this is because if experience is too slow then progression is too grindy and if experience is too fast then progression is skipped altogether. You have to find a middle-ground for your audience wherein progression is stable and balanced with everything else. That requires a good grasp of everything. It should be automatic or easily applied.

There're a lot of things I could bring. There're very many useful posts in this thread. The problem is that separating the good posts from the background noise is too hard now. It's not consolidated. This thread is like a big pile of hay now and there's a needle in it somewhere. It's like walking up to a crowd of people and asking them how to save the country. Then they all shout at once. It's quickly forgotten.
__________________
Full-Time noob. Wipes your windows, joins your groups.

Raiding: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...&postcount=109
P1999 Class Popularity Chart: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...7&postcount=48
P1999 PvP Statistics: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=59

"Global chat is to conversation what pok books are to travel, but without sufficient population it doesn't matter."
Last edited by stormlord; 01-03-2012 at 01:34 PM..
  #510  
Old 01-03-2012, 01:09 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

From your sig: just fyi pok books f'd up pvp too.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.