Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Zuranthium [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Indeed that's what you've been doing this entire time. Nobody agrees with you, but you keep spamming the same wrong things nonstop. You don't even agree with yourself, but nothing will stop your flatearther mentality, you would rather stay in a burning building than admit there is a fire.

Your feedback was already incorporated, but that's not what you care about anyway. You're only interested in your own harebrained ranting, not the community or reasoning. Everyone else is only evil and wrong at all times unless they adopt your exact position.

This is incorrect. Not everyone agrees with you. You have been trying to force your rules since page one, and decided to edit the wiki to win the argument. That is childish behavior, and hurts the wiki.

I tried to compromise with file versioning. You simply cannot compromise.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one has contacted me about Zura or Sam abusing the wiki. If someone did, I would investigate it (impartially). If I found it was warranted, I would apply an appropriate penalty to them as well.

I believe they did abuse the wiki by editing the wiki to win the argument in this thread, rather than do it objectively. I disagreed with their changes, but they kept putting their changes back in without compromise.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No one has contacted me about Zura or Sam abusing the wiki. If someone did, I would investigate it (impartially). If I found it was warranted, I would apply an appropriate penalty to them as well.

You should really have no power to do any of that, after your expletive laden personal attacks in server chat.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not everyone agrees with you. You have been trying to force your rules since page one

And he was correct from page 1. The challenge was outdated (written pre-Velious) and included some glaring oversights.

You are not every one. If we're being honest, you're actually nobody.

You have already proven that you are not making any arguments here in good faith. Any authority you claim to have on the subject is not recognized, and for the time being, any feedback you might have on the subject will be disregarded.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is childish behavior, and hurts the wiki.

No THIS is childish behavior that hurts the wiki:

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And he was correct from page 1. The challenge was outdated (written pre-Velious) and included some glaring oversights.

You are not every one. If we're being honest, you're actually nobody.

You have already proven that you are not making any arguments here in good faith. Any authority you claim to have on the subject is not recognized, and for the time being, any feedback you might have on the subject will be disregarded.



No THIS is childish behavior that hurts the wiki:

https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history

Impersonating someone else by creating new pages in their name 8 times is excessive and suspension seems well deserved.

More trolling. This just hurts you.

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Point of order, can someone please let me know how ad hominem attacks from DSM can hurt me? I feel fine...

I am glad you feel healthy!

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

More trolling. This just hurts you.

Point of order, can someone please let me know how ad hominem attacks from DSM can hurt me? I feel fine...

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I believe they did abuse the wiki by editing the wiki to win the argument in this thread, rather than do it objectively. I disagreed with their changes, but they kept putting their changes back in without compromise.

Looking at https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history I see a bunch of passionate editors disagreeing, but no clear wiki abuse. I didn't wade through every edit though, so if someone wants to draw my attention to actual wiki abuse, I'll happily change my mind.

Otherwise, I think the best thing is to give that page a week to let everyone cool off. As others in this thread have noted, a fresh thread (not full of DSM fights) would be the ideal place to discuss this topic more dispassionately, and hopefully that can lead to some productive consensus about the best direction of the page.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Looking at https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history I see a bunch of passionate editors disagreeing, but no clear wiki abuse. I didn't wade through every edit though, so if someone wants to draw my attention to actual wiki abuse, I'll happily change my mind.

Otherwise, I think the best thing is to give that page a week to let everyone cool off. As others in this thread have noted, a fresh thread (not full of DSM fights) would be the ideal place to discuss this topic more dispassionately, and hopefully that can lead to some productive consensus about the best direction of the page.

Thanks for looking into it. I would love to see the rule where adding a wiki page for file versioning purposes is wiki abuse.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Looking at https://wiki.project1999.com/index.p...action=history I see a bunch of passionate editors disagreeing, but no clear wiki abuse.

If you actually look closely, you'll see a few people trying to update the page for post-Velious content. They might not have immediately agreed on changes, but they recognize changes were necessary.

Then you'll see a third poster just indiscriminately flipping any changes made because he's butt hurt about being wrong.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you actually look closely, you'll see a few people trying to update the page for post-Velious content. They might not have immediately agreed on changes, but they recognize changes were necessary.

Then you'll see a third poster just indiscriminately flipping any changes made because he's butt hurt about being wrong.

Last time I checked you and Zur aren't the only people on the wiki. Your changes are poorly constructed, cause more confusion, and break the hall of fame page. I am not sure why you insist that your changes must be correct.