Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Said Crede … not in the context of this thread.

Let's explore that specific thread, to see if we can figure out Troxx's logic.

Here is the thread:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=418868

The title is "How do solo enchanters deal with death?"

Both this thread and the thread Crede replied to specifies the number of main characters being played. Crede's thread is 1, and this thread is 4.

The titles of both threads do not say "pocket characters are not allowed". Nor does the OP say "pocket characters are not allowed" in both threads.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From the god damn title of this thread along with the first 100+ pages of the thread.

This is Troxx's answer as to why pocket characters are not allowed in this thead.

Why is Crede able to bring up pocket characters in that thread, but we can't do it in this thread? Both threads are set up the same logically. Either pocket characters are allowed in both, or they are allowed in neither.

As a reminder, this is Crede's post:

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Level a cleric and have people log it in as needed. I have an epic cleric that’s been 54 since 2014 and he has done countless rezzes. Just a phenomenal class that everyone should have at least one of.

[Keebz]

Most people in this thread arguing with you, have their own 60 pocket shaman or access to one. Nice try.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Keebz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Most people in this thread arguing with you, have their own 60 pocket shaman or access to one. Nice try.

Having a level 60 main/alt is not the same as having a pocket character by definition. Trying to pretend a main/alt character is the same as a pocket character is silly.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=5521 - read this post for the definition of pocket character.

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don’t think I could give a definition to the term ‘pocket character’ that fully describes what is being talked about.

I think I would define a pocket character as one that is used for non-combat utility. Buffs, ports, rezzes, coth, corpse dragging.

A cleric that is necessary for complete healing a charm pet throughout an encounter is not in your pocket.

[Zuranthium]

Pocket. Characters. Are. Not. Allowed. Here. WTF do you not understand, DSM. The topic is 4 characters only working together. Stop trying to strawman with "the OP never said it". EVERYONE in the thread is telling you the subject of the discussion is without a pocket characters. Stop trying to change what people are talking about and stop trying to act like you are the arbiter of what a "pocket character" means, you are not the arbiter of ANYTHING. Including having an understanding of the Shaman class. There's absolutely nothing you understand about it that others here don't understand equally/better.

[Toxigen]

the 4th players role is to constantly swap between all the pocket characters for max buffs

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the 4th players role is to constantly swap between all the pocket characters for max buffs

And distribute hot pockets … and bring bed pans so they don’t have to interrupt their game play.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Toxigen]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And distribute hot pockets … and bring bed pans so they don’t have to interrupt their game play.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM's potty bitch.

[Troxx]

Pocket potty

[Elizondo]

DSM trying to distract from the fact he plays shaman so badly

Video Evidence leaves no doubt