Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #571  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:49 AM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You want a point system then make it an effort based system that rewards guilds that are willing to put in the effort tracking and killing the targets that take more work/effort.
If you have truly been following my posts then you would know that a different compromise has been offered by the majority in a vent conversation among the guild reps two nights ago, that is being revisited tonight before the hammer comes down. So if you are going to make these kind of statements at least know what you are talking about.
  #572  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:50 AM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hmm so the GMs are going to let this extortion stand?
They are promoting the "extortion", genius.
  #573  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:55 AM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

I"ll be honest. It looks like Taken and BDA and whoever else are simply trying to squeeze more out of this situation because the GMs gave you the power to do so. Your right, raid suspension hurts the big guilds more. And yes, GMs want a unanimous agreement from all guilds.

Let's imagine that we weren't threatened with a raid suspension and this current proposal was posted. People would go fucking INSANE for it. Big guilds said they are willing to give up tons of targets every month, including 1/4th of the ones they want the most. Guilds that were previously getting nothing, can get multiple targets weekly. They can set up a rotation between themselves if they don't want to do any work. That's left up to them. And still allowed to compete with the top guilds if they choose to. Nothing even close to this has ever been on the table. It would be accepted without a second thought, there would be no holding out for MORE. Want some inside info? This agreement was drafted and posted on our boards for review a day before Sirken's threat. Our officers didn't come up with this because they had the threat of a suspension looming. They actually wanted to make the raid scene better. And you all shit on it like this, just because you can. Imo threatening the server was a mistake, and now this is all so messy and hateful when it doesn't need to be.
Last edited by Hitpoint; 01-01-2014 at 11:59 AM..
  #574  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:56 AM
Seltius Seltius is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Catherin- [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you have truly been following my posts then you would know that a different compromise has been offered by the majority in a vent conversation among the guild reps two nights ago, that is being revisited tonight before the hammer comes down. So if you are going to make these kind of statements at least know what you are talking about.
Sorry I stopped really reading your post after that shit stain of a reply that I quoted above. Your still welcome to a ham biscuit if you want.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They are promoting the "extortion", genius.
I still love you Tecmos you have always been a good guy.
  #575  
Old 01-01-2014, 11:59 AM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Wanting more concessions than were proposed doesn't mean anyone is shitting on this proposal. It's not like hardcore raiders are giving up that much on an absolute scale, seeing as they already have killed all this shit 300 times and have alts decked in raid loot and still have a relative monopoly on VP.
  #576  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:00 PM
Tecmos Deception Tecmos Deception is offline
Planar Protector

Tecmos Deception's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,785
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I still love you Tecmos you have always been a good guy.
Haha. I just can't stay out of the shit sometimes. I don't even care, personally, because I don't intend for Tecmos to do real raiding ever [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #577  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:02 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tecmos Deception [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wanting more concessions than were proposed doesn't mean anyone is shitting on this proposal. It's not like hardcore raiders are giving up that much on an absolute scale, seeing as they already have killed all this shit 300 times and have alts decked in raid loot and still have a relative monopoly on VP.
You're talking about TMO with this paragraph. FE/IB doesn't even have decked mains. MOST of these mobs we haven't even killed in the double digits, despite killing ourselves for months trying to. We have no monopoly on VP once this suspension ends. You can't make blanket statements like this.

And out of every guild on this server we're losing the most with this deal. Your right, TMO doesn't need anything anymore and they've farmed it all for years. The position of every other guild on the server only improves with this proposal. Essentially, we are stuck competing with TMO just as hard as we always have, except with half the opportunities to do so.
Last edited by Hitpoint; 01-01-2014 at 12:05 PM..
  #578  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:03 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you don't like the concessions guilds are willing to make.
Just me again? the majority of the guilds dont like it. not just ME


Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You want an across the board sweep that makes everyone equal no matter the difference in effort they have or are willing to put into the game.
Wrong. a compromise was offered that is a great mix of something for the casuals and the same competition we have had with no changes for the other half of the time. Once again showing you are making statements without actually knowing anything.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You said it no one else did.
Once again I thought you said you were keeping up with the posts. Or do you have a selective reading disorder?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You threatened Extortion because someone else didn't support your stance.
once again you give me too much credit if you think I could single handedly "extort" the server to do what I want. Extortion, Dictation, Socialism, whatever you ragers want to try to label it, is absolute nonsense. People have the right to hold out if the terms presented to them by the minority are seen as completely unacceptable, so that we can all work together and work something out that is actually going to work for the present and the future going into Velious. This is what Rogean has tasked people with. And im not alone in this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seltius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I had to eat crow last night because of something I said and guess what you do too.
You are sorely mistaken if you think I regret the statement I made [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I want something that is better for all of us. not just you and not just me. And considering the particular few people that statement has drawn the most ire from, im feeling pretty morally safe

You have thus far offered nothing of value to this conversation other than trying to slander and discredit others

in before NUH UH!!!!
Last edited by -Catherin-; 01-01-2014 at 12:26 PM..
  #579  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:03 PM
DrKvothe DrKvothe is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 412
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I"ll be honest. It looks like Taken and BDA and whoever else are simply trying to squeeze more out of this situation because the GMs gave you the power to do so. Your right, raid suspension hurts the big guilds more. And yes, GMs want a unanimous agreement from all guilds.

Let's imagine that we weren't threatened with a raid suspension and this current proposal was posted. People would go fucking INSANE for it. Big guilds said they are willing to give up tons of targets every month, including 1/4th of the ones they want the most. Guilds that were previously getting nothing, can get multiple targets weekly. They can set up a rotation between themselves if they don't want to do any work. That's left up to them. And still allowed to compete with the top guilds if they choose to. Nothing even close to this has ever been on the table. It would be accepted without a second thought, there would be no holding out for MORE. Want some inside info? This agreement was drafted and posted on our boards for review a day before Sirken's threat. Our officers didn't come up with this because they had the threat of a suspension looming. They actually wanted to make the raid scene better. And you all shit on it like this, just because you can.
I've got an idea. TMO perma-banned from all non-VP content. If they want an epic for a 4th alt, they can buy it from A-Team.
__________________
Winga - 59 Barbarian Shaman <BDA>
Hairyporter - 29 Halfling Druid
  #580  
Old 01-01-2014, 12:09 PM
Tuljin Tuljin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 636
Default

FORUMQUEST
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.