OFFICIAL PROPOSAL from FE/TMO

[JayN]

all these rule proposals are great in all but without enforcement, its nothing really.

whos going to be watching everything all the time to make sure people dont break these rules?

[Turp_SmokinPurp]

Originally Posted by JayN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

all these rule proposals are great in all but without enforcement, its nothing really.

whos going to be watching everything all the time to make sure people dont break these rules?

The players.
You cannot sneak a dragon on this server.
Plenty of things listed in that OP that would police this. 1 . Being the guild council.

[Pan]

Does not meet these criteria (sirken) in the least:

remember this is NOT about helping guildA or hurting guildB or anything that retardedly short sighted. we are trying to build a better server, both to allow current players to have lots of fun, but also a server that will be welcoming to another 600-1000 players after velious launches, and allow them to have fun as well.

Carves out huge penalties for guilds hoping to advance past any one of a number of plateaus. Makes the high-value targets less accessible to the up and comers.

This is purely by the big dogs for the big dogs and ensures that others cannot tread on their turf.

[Derubael]

If you are a guild leader or an officer with the power to represent your guild and do not like this proposal, you should be contacting Unbrella and Zagum and working out a time where you can either A) talk about your proposal or B) make modifications to this one.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are a guild leader or an officer with the power to represent your guild and do not like this proposal, you should be contacting Unbrella and Zagum and working out a time where you can either A) talk about your proposal or B) make modifications to this one.

I'd like to see Taken, Divinity, BDA, A-team, etc put together an agreement.

[Kope]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd like to see Taken, Divinity, BDA, A-team, etc put together an agreement.

Divinity has released a proposal to the leadership of all but one top guild on the server (AG we attempted to contact but the work week caught up to us before we were able to get in touch with them).

Many were at least relatively positive about it.

[Nlaar]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd like to see Taken, Divinity, BDA, A-team, etc put together an agreement.

Divinity put together a nice proposal imo.

[Bossman]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are a guild leader or an officer with the power to represent your guild and do not like this proposal, you should be contacting Unbrella and Zagum and working out a time where you can either A) talk about your proposal or B) make modifications to this one.

No offense Deru, but that's BS. How is this "official" proposal given more levity than any of the proposals that were discussed (namely point system)?

Let everybody get together as hash this out, not discuss with TMO behind closed doors.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Bossman [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No offense Deru, but that's BS. How is this "official" proposal given more levity than any of the proposals that were discussed (namely point system)?

Let everybody get together as hash this out, not discuss with TMO behind closed doors.

Because guilds as a whole(representing raiders) have signed off on this one.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because guilds as a whole(representing raiders) have signed off on this one.

Namely the ones causing the problems for the other guilds that wanted to raid.