Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-27-2018, 04:03 AM
dcrag dcrag is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 73
Default

I remember once, in classic, a GM zoned into sleepers tomb and very clearly stated the only thing they would ever intervene on would be exploitation of game mechanics. Can we do that?
  #52  
Old 11-27-2018, 04:09 AM
dcrag dcrag is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 73
Default

Actually now that I think about that was sullon zek, not the best idea.
  #53  
Old 11-27-2018, 04:27 AM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
GM enforced rotations are not a good idea. People will just park alts in the guilds that are rotating to avoid the restriction. So basically mains get deferred over alts.
False. GM's can check pretty easily as to who owns characters. There has already been the type of rotation on this server before that I mentioned. It was called Class R. It took very little GM involvement except for them to have a page as to which class could currently kill the mob.
  #54  
Old 11-27-2018, 05:03 AM
Tethler Tethler is offline
Planar Protector

Tethler's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vianna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not at all. It is the best solution for a healthy server.
People only being able to go after targets 2 weeks every month? Yeah, that would never fly.
  #55  
Old 11-27-2018, 05:07 AM
Swish2 Swish2 is offline
Planar Protector

Swish2's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,753
Default

I do enjoy the server's obsessions with "this should be changed" or "we should make this a rule"...
__________________
  #56  
Old 11-27-2018, 06:09 AM
dcrag dcrag is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 73
Default

Server needs no rules, wild west
  #57  
Old 11-27-2018, 06:22 AM
deezy deezy is offline
Sarnak

deezy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vianna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was called Class R.
class r didn't work
  #58  
Old 11-27-2018, 06:47 AM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tethler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
People only being able to go after targets 2 weeks every month? Yeah, that would never fly.
It would be the perfect balance for everyone and cause less work for server staff in general in policing it. I don't care how selfish people are. That is a discussion for another thread.
  #59  
Old 11-27-2018, 06:48 AM
Vianna Vianna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deezy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
class r didn't work
It worked for over a year. But this is nothing like that anyway. That was just an example.
  #60  
Old 11-27-2018, 06:52 AM
Endonde Endonde is offline
Sarnak

Endonde's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by deezy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
class r didn't work
Wut? Class R worked pretty well in terms of allowing the masses to experience content.

The class system had its issues but it was far better than the current system. It gave casuals realistic chances to kill dragons, while saving neckbeards from their greed by removing a third of the windows they had to cover.

You cant fully fix the raid scene on p99 anymore it's just gone too far, but the class system is a decent attempt at creating a solution for two very different playstyles.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:46 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.