Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 02-17-2025, 08:26 PM
NopeNopeNopeNope NopeNopeNopeNope is offline
Planar Protector

NopeNopeNopeNope's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2024
Posts: 2,121
Default

This is stupid shit. With a name like “hoe math” you can smell the incel-bias from a mile away, especially considering the 10/10 guys he’s referencing (who I assume he also despises because of their success with women) are the male versions of “hoes”…

…and that’s the crux of what this dude can’t understand. BOTH men and women have SOME of them who think they are more attractive or desirable than they really are. This is not exclusive to women

And, believe it or not, there’s a shitload, hundreds of thousands, of men and women who have pretty good self-awareness and a good idea of how their looks roughly compare. Sure women might be more picky on dating sites because they can because there’s fewer of them. And everyone becomes more picky the more populated the area they live

But there are tons of people, including my parents and multiple aunts and uncles of mine, who had an understanding of the type of person that would like them back. And they went for that person on a dating site. And they married that person. They didn’t waste years and years trying for 10/10 men or women, or even people significantly out of their league. Why didn’t they? Because they’re not overconfident cocky morons?

My armchair psychological assessment is that the narrator is unsuccessful with women. And the reason is he thinks that he is more attractive than he really is. And then he projects that idea onto the entire USA population and assumes everyone in the country has that problem

I’d love to see this dude interview an insecure, depressed person, male or female. And have him ask them what they rate their own looks as and what they think they could get or deserve in a partner. He’d be astounded when they say “I’m like a 1/10 [when really they are like a 5/10], and I deserve no one”

Oh no, then his entire system falls apart, doesn’t it? A woman who thinks she is much uglier than she is and doesn’t try for chads? This can’t be!!!

Dude needs to stop projecting

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 02-17-2025, 08:41 PM
NopeNopeNopeNope NopeNopeNopeNope is offline
Planar Protector

NopeNopeNopeNope's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2024
Posts: 2,121
Default

^
This being said, yes there is a “numbers game” strategy, and because it can be effective, I’m sure it subconsciously reinforces this guy’s world view

And that “numbers game” strategy is that, if a 6/10 looks dude went around outside bars and clubs and popular hangouts and asked out 500 women significantly out of his league (which would mean dozens per night out), eventually he would get a “yes”

That’s assuming this person can mentally handle the hundreds of rejections. And the female version would be a woman who either also gets rejected or only gets a one night stand-> ghost with a “Chad” guy. A string of these would also tend to wear negatively on their self-esteem, believe me

So is it an effective strategy? Sure, one of the most effective if you want to “punch above” your dating weight. Does it mean that all men and women behave or should behave in this way? No

Like I said, good luck with your hundreds of rejections trying it
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:10 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,530
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:15 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,530
Default

Up for debate:

If mankind builds AI girlfriend's/boyfriends.

And also invents birthing pods, so traditional relationships between men and woman would no longer be required for procreation.

Would women disappear?
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:22 PM
Ekco Ekco is offline
Planar Protector

Ekco's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Felwithe
Posts: 4,124
Default

you might as well go full transhumanism at that point and do away with the concept of gender all together

the furries and freaks in VR chat are already there anyways.

the metaverse already exists, VR chat is straight up ripped from the pages of Snow Crash

Quote:
The couples coming off the monorail can't afford to have custom avatars made and don't know how to write their own. They have to buy off-the-shelf avatars. One of the girls has a pretty nice one. It would be considered quite the fashion statement among the K-Tel set. Looks like she has bought the Avatar Construction Set (tm) and put together her own, customized model
out of miscellaneous parts. It might even look something like its owner. Her date doesn't look half bad himself.

The other girl is a Brandy. Her date is a Clint. Brandy and Clint are both popular, off-the-shelf models. When white-trash high school girls are going on a date in the Metaverse, they invariably run down to the computer games section of the local Wal-Mart and buy a copy of Brandy. The user can select three breast sizes: improbable, impossible, and ludicrous. Brandy has a limited repertoire of facial expressions: cute and pouty; cute and sultry; perky and interested; smiling and receptive; cute and spacy. Her eyelashes are half an inch long, and the software is so cheap that they are rendered as solid ebony chips. When a Brandy flutters her eyelashes, you can almost feel the breeze. Clint is just the male counterpart of Brandy. He is craggy and handsome and has an extremely limited range of facial expressions.
Last edited by Ekco; 02-17-2025 at 09:29 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:25 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,530
Default

Would we? Or would elon musk and andrew tate and all those types of people just kick out all the girls.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:33 PM
Ekco Ekco is offline
Planar Protector

Ekco's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Felwithe
Posts: 4,124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Would we? Or would elon musk and andrew tate and all those types of people just kick out all the girls.
the aspie girls will be protected at all costs by nerds, they won't let tate harm them.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:42 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
the aspie girls will be protected at all costs by nerds, they won't let tate harm them.
would they or would they be to busy fucking their ai girlfriends?

Last edited by shovelquest; 02-17-2025 at 09:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:52 PM
Ekco Ekco is offline
Planar Protector

Ekco's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Felwithe
Posts: 4,124
Default

i mean, i hope so lol.

i actually don't think that shit is gonna catch on, using AI and Big Data to find someone your actually compatible with i think is going to be pretty popular

and robot lovers will be a minority
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 02-17-2025, 09:58 PM
shovelquest shovelquest is online now
Planar Protector

shovelquest's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 3,530
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekco [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i mean, i hope so lol.

i actually don't think that shit is gonna catch on, using AI and Big Data to find someone your actually compatible with i think is going to be pretty popular

and robot lovers will be a minority
idk Im not saying its one way or the other but, it seems like the more a society progresses (japan, usa for example) the people stop getting into relationships and stop having kids.

I could see a world where naggy women are gone.

Like do we really need to listen to this crap?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.