Ogre Shaman Starting Stats

[Trexller]

wtf, here?

facepalm

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope. Throwing a flag on this one.

people here about stockpiles of 5000+ nukes

they don't understand that the vast majority of these are ground penetrators and anti-sea vessel weapons.

wanna survive a nuke fight? live rural and at altitude, you'll be fine

I've heard the southeastern slope of a mountain or range is a great spot.

[Gugg]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nope. Throwing a flag on this one.

people here about stockpiles of 5000+ nukes

they don't understand that the vast majority of these are ground penetrators and anti-sea vessel weapons.

wanna survive a nuke fight? live rural and at altitude, you'll be fine

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've heard the southeastern slope of a mountain or range is a great spot.

yeah radiation doesn't settle uniformly, so look at a map and if there's a major city or military installation within like ~100mi east of you then there's major fallout coming.

any valley or area with stagnant/slow winds are gonna be places where radiation will settle

it also depends heavily on the bomb design, the more efficient the reaction the less radiation there will be

unless its a "salted nuke" like a cobalt-tritium bomb, who's purpose is to generate alot of fallout, then you're gonna be a TV dinner.

[Gugg]

I'll tell you why the military, moon landings, WW2, Vietnam, bull fighting etc...anything involving extreme danger...is fake news...

 

Atheists are all talk because they have no backbone

[Gugg]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[magnetaress]

The fallout in the midwest will be bad but somewhere in the rockies probably ok

[magnetaress]

MONKS are OP BECAUSE They MITIGATE TOO MUCH DAMAGE and DO TOO MUCH DAMAGE

Monks should be more like rogues that can FD and do less damage than rogues because of their utility and downtime reducing abilities (mend and FD).

The hierarchy of melee survivability should be:

Warrior
Rogue
MONK

the hierarchy of melee dps should be:

RogUE
Warrior <3
MONK

<3

[Gugg]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Gugg]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

MONKS are OP BECAUSE They MITIGATE TOO MUCH DAMAGE and DO TOO MUCH DAMAGE

Monks should be more like rogues that can FD and do less damage than rogues because of their utility and downtime reducing abilities (mend and FD).

The hierarchy of melee survivability should be:

Warrior
Rogue
MONK

the hierarchy of melee dps should be:

RogUE
Warrior <3
MONK

<3

How did you determine Monks do too much damage and don't take enough damage?

Monks could be just right and the other classes subpar.